timenude question room for improvment

by **meTal1981** » Thu Sep 03, 2009 5:26 pm

Really this is'nt needed due to anti lag being enabled, I know how it works and what the issue is with it and why some players always say that timenude can make you lag imo it can

the purpose for timenudge is to slow down the game in order to see players move slower = smoother

but when the server gets alot of players on it round about 30ish the server seems to get saturated resulting in other players being laggy so being unable to register a hit.

anyways I would like to know what other people think !!

by **S.Shooter** » Thu Sep 03, 2009 7:14 pm

I say this server was the greatest server in Wolf history for a few days, when we had timenudge set to 0. Was about 2 months ago.

The registration was perfect! - Even with lots of players on.

For once we could frag 3-4 players in one clip - like the game is suppose to be experienced if you aim decent. Doesn't happen now tho.

by **=TAO=Flessan** » Fri Sep 04, 2009 12:38 am

Damnit all.. I opened this thread with high hopes and then I realize you just forgot the "g"

by **Slaughter2** » Fri Sep 04, 2009 5:03 am

-20 is it now

by **meTal1981** » Fri Sep 04, 2009 7:09 am

Yeah sorry forgot to check my post after I made it I blame my dodgy keyboard..(NEEDS A CLEAN)

aways to just elaborate from what I put earlyer about when the server gets full. If theres alot of people using timenudge this will start to saturate the server

the server is a 64slot server 9x out of ten always playing beach map
and beach is so laggy with high amounts of players on it

for me it would be good to get timenudge turned off using less server resources that way

()(correct hit regstering settings baced on 125fps)()

seta snaps 20 /should be the same as the servers sv_fps
seta cl_maxpackets 63 / the highest amount you will get with 125fps
seta cl_packetdup 1

by **=TAO=WARPIG** » Fri Sep 04, 2009 7:28 am

meTal1981 wrote:If theres alot of people using timenudge this will start to saturate the server

looks like you up a creek then.

by **Leafy** » Fri Sep 04, 2009 9:00 am

=TAO=Flessan wrote:Damnit all.. I opened this thread with high hopes and then I realize you just forgot the "g"

ROFL

by **liquidswords** » Fri Sep 04, 2009 4:57 pm

meTal1981 wrote: seta snaps 20 /should be the same as the servers sv_fps
seta cl_maxpackets 63 / the highest amount you will get with 125fps
seta cl_packetdup 1

i know that 63 is supposed to be the same as 100 when using 125fps, however my registration seems better with 100 maxpackets. not sure why. you are correct about 20 snaps though. dunno why everyone used 40 back in the day. maybe just placebo.

by **meTal1981** » Sat Sep 05, 2009 7:31 am

only wayyou get 100maxpackets is if your fps is 100

by **liquidswords** » Sun Sep 06, 2009 1:17 am

meTal1981 wrote:only wayyou get 100maxpackets is if your fps is 100

yes, i know. but 100 feels different than 63 with 125fps, even though from a technical standpoint it shouldn't.

by **meTal1981** » Sun Sep 06, 2009 4:39 pm

It's because your use to it rounding DOWN to the next valid value!

100 or 63 I don't feel any difference in smoothness wise only, thing I see a improvement in is hit registration.

Maybe your running 125Hz mouse which can make the game feel very unsmooth

timenude question room for improvment

timenude question room for improvment

Re: timenude question room for improvment

Re: timenude question room for improvment

Re: timenude question room for improvment

Re: timenude question room for improvment

Re: timenude question room for improvment

Re: timenude question room for improvment

Re: timenude question room for improvment

Re: timenude question room for improvment

Re: timenude question room for improvment

Re: timenude question room for improvment

Who is online