Tue Aug 31, 2004 8:22 pm
does make you wonder
Tue Aug 31, 2004 8:36 pm
Hmm...
Tue Aug 31, 2004 8:36 pm
It really does make you wonder...
Tue Aug 31, 2004 8:37 pm
Yup... I remember the first news reports of that crash, they thought it was a small commuter aircraft...
Its says things if they can get a missile into the country... of course, if we knew the truth we probably wish we didnt know the truth...
Its says things if they can get a missile into the country... of course, if we knew the truth we probably wish we didnt know the truth...
Tue Aug 31, 2004 8:38 pm
Well how does one explain the missing aircraft and its missing passengers if they didn't end up in the Pentagon wreckage. At the speed that plane was going, it would make a very nice symmetrical hole (about the size of an airplane fuselage, I might add) as depicted in those pictures.
Why would people find it odd that they would drag items out of the Pentagon that were covered-up? Wouldn't you think they might have some top-secret hardware and/or construction techniques that we wouldn't want the general populace to know about?
It mentions no damage caused by the wings but when you see the overlay of the 757 against the damaged building, it quite clearly shows damage almost exactly as wide as the wingspan of the plane.
When someone can tell me what happened to that flight and its passengers then I'll be inclined to give some credibility to these cover-up stories.
Until then, it's just nonsense to me.
Why would people find it odd that they would drag items out of the Pentagon that were covered-up? Wouldn't you think they might have some top-secret hardware and/or construction techniques that we wouldn't want the general populace to know about?
It mentions no damage caused by the wings but when you see the overlay of the 757 against the damaged building, it quite clearly shows damage almost exactly as wide as the wingspan of the plane.
When someone can tell me what happened to that flight and its passengers then I'll be inclined to give some credibility to these cover-up stories.
Until then, it's just nonsense to me.
Tue Aug 31, 2004 8:40 pm
Thanks very interesting
Tue Aug 31, 2004 8:41 pm
You know, come to think of it, when I first heard that it was a 757 that flew into the Pentagon - I didn't think the damage looked like it had been caused by a 757. Weird. Whoever blew it up though - should burn in hell.
Tue Aug 31, 2004 8:41 pm
Originally posted by hightimber
Until then, it's just nonsense to me.
Thats how i feel about the kennedy assassination....
Tue Aug 31, 2004 8:42 pm
Explain. Are you referring to the 'official' explanation or the so-called conspiracy theory?Originally posted by Kingofbeers
Thats how i feel about the kennedy assassination....
Tue Aug 31, 2004 8:46 pm
Originally posted by hightimber
Explain. Are you referring to the 'official' explanation or the so-called conspiracy theory?
to the "official"... i went down to dallas a few months ago. Saw the book depository... saw where it all went down. 3 shots from one gun? at that window? NOBODY could do it. Bolt action rifle, 3 shots in 5 or so seconds.... getting perfect aim while the vehicle is headed down and away from the building... as well as curving.
I love conspiracy theories.... well at least ones that could "possibly" happen in my view. Was kennedy killed by one person name Oswald? No way.
Tue Aug 31, 2004 8:47 pm
They could have ditched it into the water timber...
Tue Aug 31, 2004 8:48 pm
very good. It makes you think for yourself instead of being spoon-fed what the media tells you.
I can easily believe that a missle was shot into the Pentagon and another missle took down the airplane (that they want nobody to know about).
It is not outside of the realm of possibility for me.
I can easily believe that a missle was shot into the Pentagon and another missle took down the airplane (that they want nobody to know about).
It is not outside of the realm of possibility for me.
Tue Aug 31, 2004 8:53 pm
How do you explain the cell calls from spouses though? Don't you think they would've mentioned travelling over the ocean? What about the scores of air-traffic controllers that would've seen these jets way off course? Were they all silenced?Originally posted by deathBOB
They could have ditched it into the water timber...
These stories are quite sensational enough without trying to make up sh*t.
I just saw some site called 911uncovered.com (I hesitate to even advertise it) where they are claiming that it was missiles that took down the WTC and not planes. Uh, didn't anyone see the videos clearly showing airplanes crashing into those towers??!??! Some people have some vivid-assed imaginations.
Tue Aug 31, 2004 8:55 pm
I've watched documentaries where they have, in fact, shown that the marksmanship required wasn't that extraordinary and the shots could be fired in the time span claimed in the 'official' explanation.Originally posted by Kingofbeers
to the "official"... i went down to dallas a few months ago. Saw the book depository... saw where it all went down. 3 shots from one gun? at that window? NOBODY could do it. Bolt action rifle, 3 shots in 5 or so seconds.... getting perfect aim while the vehicle is headed down and away from the building... as well as curving.
I love conspiracy theories.... well at least ones that could "possibly" happen in my view. Was kennedy killed by one person name Oswald? No way.
I'm certainly not saying that Oswald acted alone but I do believe that he could've made those shots.