Kerry-class Carrier
Mon Jun 07, 2004 1:41 pm
Subject: NEW AIRCRAFT CARRIERS
The aircraft carrier, USS Ronald Reagan, was launched earlier this year with much fanfare as the largest and most powerful ship of its class in existence. In light of this, Senator John Kerry has promised that if he is elected president, he will be cutting defense dollars where he can because he believes in a lighter, more maneuverable force; such as the "swift boats" he commanded during the FOUR WHOLE MONTHS he was in Viet Nam.
The Navy is already preparing for this possibility by designing and naming a new class of Aircraft Carriers after him. Below, you will find a photo of the new "Kerry Class" Aircraft Carrier. This will assure the US Navy of being an elite and cost effective naval force.
The aircraft carrier, USS Ronald Reagan, was launched earlier this year with much fanfare as the largest and most powerful ship of its class in existence. In light of this, Senator John Kerry has promised that if he is elected president, he will be cutting defense dollars where he can because he believes in a lighter, more maneuverable force; such as the "swift boats" he commanded during the FOUR WHOLE MONTHS he was in Viet Nam.
The Navy is already preparing for this possibility by designing and naming a new class of Aircraft Carriers after him. Below, you will find a photo of the new "Kerry Class" Aircraft Carrier. This will assure the US Navy of being an elite and cost effective naval force.
Mon Jun 07, 2004 1:44 pm
got some campers there
Mon Jun 07, 2004 1:48 pm
not sure which is worse landing or taking off on that thing
Mon Jun 07, 2004 1:56 pm
:rotflmao:Originally posted by Rocky Dennis
got some campers there
Mon Jun 07, 2004 2:08 pm
Battlefield:The Road to the White House Expansion Pack
Mon Jun 07, 2004 2:12 pm
got some campers there
BWAHAHA!
Mon Jun 07, 2004 9:40 pm
WW2 UK made battlecruisers which were faster but had very thin armor. ANd they were sunk incredibly easy. I say stick with heavy slow and well armored.
(not that if a battleship got close to any carrier it wouldn't sink it easy)
(not that if a battleship got close to any carrier it wouldn't sink it easy)
Mon Jun 07, 2004 11:17 pm
Originally posted by LordShard
WW2 UK made battlecruisers which were faster but had very thin armor. ANd they were sunk incredibly easy. I say stick with heavy slow and well armored.
(not that if a battleship got close to any carrier it wouldn't sink it easy)
People will use the new carrier to cap flags; therefore it will be sunk.
Mon Jun 07, 2004 11:22 pm
Nice photo 