All Hail Capital Punishment

by **SkiloDog2000** » Wed Mar 16, 2005 11:29 pm

http://tb038.k12.sd.us/Wrestling03_files/Guns_and_Roses_-_Welcome_to_the_Jungle_1.mp3
welcome to the jungle bitches

wheres my brother, whens he coming back
hees not coming back you dumass, you shot him in the head
idk about the rest of you but i knew that you could kill somone with a gun at age 4
theres somthing i like to call parenting, its when people teach their kids not to do stupid shit. this lady needs to get some serious fineage and possibly parol for being stupid.
i mean whats this kid gunna be like when he grows up, he was a killer at age 4

dont hand guns have somewhat of a trigger resistance anyways?

by **Sayntfuu** » Thu Mar 17, 2005 1:18 am

The death penalty is not a deterant.

fuu

by **El Snipo** » Thu Mar 17, 2005 5:17 pm

Geez, why all the talk about the horrible crimes? what about the hot Florida teacher Pamela Turner who got some from one of her students that we recently talked about... why didn't I have an education like that in middle school...

by **Colonel Ingus** » Thu Mar 17, 2005 5:28 pm

Originally posted by Sayntfuu
The death penalty is not a deterant.

fuu

Thats about as big a load of horseshit as I have heard in a while.

I can gauranty that anyone who was put to death for a crime NEVER commited crimes again.

Care to argue that?

by **EZC** » Thu Mar 17, 2005 6:10 pm

good point. But people still commit autrocities ( big word i know) . Still i believe if u kill someone u must pay a price if it was life imprisonment or being killed. I know one thing if they killed u lilke they did in Braveheart most people would stop.

by **flapjack** » Thu Mar 17, 2005 6:20 pm

Originally posted by Colonel Ingus
Thats about as big a load of horseshit as I have heard in a while.

I can gauranty that anyone who was put to death for a crime NEVER commited crimes again.

Care to argue that?

I think he was refering to a deterant to those still living. Death penalty exists yet people still murder.

by **Davis** » Thu Mar 17, 2005 7:12 pm

Originally posted by EZC
:lol: good point. But people still commit autrocities ( big word i know) . Still i believe if u kill someone u must pay a price if it was life imprisonment or being killed. I know one thing if they killed u lilke they did in Braveheart most people would stop.

Life imprisonment i do not get..... we tax payers get to pay for some one who is serving life...

And why is there a HUGE waiting list for the electrict chair?

Some people have waited 15 years for the death penalty..... and have not actually got puttin to death yet.....

WTF is that?what are they doing like one guy a week?

Why not 50? One after another?

Good ol texas.......... if you kill somebody........... we......... the state........ will kill you back........ and can't forget the 3 CREDIBAL witnesses that actaul testify......... you don't wait on death row for 10/ 20 years jack.... you get your ass to the FRONT OF THE LINE..... if there is a actual line....

Well its been like that for... hell only god knows "if there is one?"

S. Peterson, was transferd to a differant jail facility.... which was housing more than half the people there, don't have lawyer's.....

Bad scene, being the pubic... or the criminal.

One things for damn sure.... colin powell isn't helping things...

Ok thats all i got for now.

by **frankk6969** » Thu Mar 17, 2005 8:56 pm

Originally posted by SkiloDog2000
dont hand guns have somewhat of a trigger resistance anyways?

The only thing I can think of is the safety but that is easy to figure out. Glocks have a special trigger safety where they will only shoot if you pull down on the middle of the trigger.

by **cavalierlwt** » Fri Mar 18, 2005 12:10 am

My .02 worth:
I think the Death Penalty should be used only in certain cases, where it is a particulary heinous crime, and the evidence is airtight, I mean AIRTIGHT. A confession, a good eyewitness to the actual murder, or the body linked to the weaon, linked to the murderer. AIRTIGHT!
As much as I think Scott Peterson killed his wife, I wouldn't give him the death penalty as all his evidence is circumstantial, even though there are mountains of it. I'd give him the life sentence.
As for the effectiveness of the Death Penalty..it's not a deterant. As long as we in the public know that it doesn't deter other people from committing crime, and it doesn't save money in the long run (the appeals process is important yet expensive), I'm ok with it. We just need to recognize the DP for what it really is... Justice.
Killing Tim McVeigh didn't deter any future criminals, but it made me feel better knowing he was dead, that justice had been served. Same for that douchebag that killed Polly Klaas, admitted it, smirked and gave the grieving familiy the finger in court. Killing him was a good thing all by itself, without any exterior ramifications.

by **Davis** » Fri Mar 18, 2005 12:34 am

Originally posted by cavalierlwt
M
As much as I think Scott Peterson killed his wife, I wouldn't give him the death penalty as all his evidence is circumstantial, even though there are mountains of it. I'd give him the life sentence.

And the death of there unborn child.... a fetus...... which got him second dagree..... which in turn.... made him eligible for a death sentence...

So he killed her, and there unborn child.... 2 counts of manslaughter.

by **cavalierlwt** » Fri Mar 18, 2005 3:18 am

I think Scott Peterson is guilty, I just wouldn't apply the death penalty with a case based on circumstantial evidence. No confession, no eyewitness to the murder, no murder weapon. Just to be one the safe side, I'd stick him in prison for life, but no death sentence.

by **Colonel Ingus** » Fri Mar 18, 2005 7:17 pm

If they would have given this absolute FUCK! the death penalty the first time the little girl would still be alive.

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,150890,00.html

by **King** » Fri Mar 18, 2005 8:02 pm

If prison meant solitary-confinement for 20 years for one crime and death for the next i think some people might shape up. Cops seem to (when not handing out parking tickets) be looking for guys they've already thrown in jail once or twice before.

by **CodeRed68** » Sat Mar 19, 2005 12:29 am

If your some fuck-face who commits a crime, especially when it involves hurting other people, you don't deserve to live in society with anyone, ever. Not after 5 years, 10 years, 20 years, 30 years. Kill them all now. Save us tax payers the money. They are incabable of being rehabilitaded, as people don't change.
My 2 cents.

by **cavalierlwt** » Sat Mar 19, 2005 5:46 am

one easy solution: stop plea bargaining with criminals. Courts are overloaded because they are cycling throught the same losers over and over again. Some crime is committed by one time criminals, but most crime is committed by habitual criminals. Don't plea bargain, take the time and money to give them the full ride, send them away for 20 years and you won't have to deal with them for 20 years. Instead they plea bargain (for a quick trial and a guaranteed conviction) in exchange for maybe a 5 year sentence, out in two with good behavior.....back in court six months later for another robbery, maybe a murder. It always blows me away when I read about some horrible murder, they catch the guy and describe his criminal record: 4-5 armed robberies, 5-6 different assualts, drugs, rape. It looks like this guy has about 400 years worth of jail time he should have served from 20 different incidents, yet the guy is maybe 30 years old and was on the streets before killing some poor person. What a f*'d up system.

All Hail Capital Punishment

Who is online