Mon Mar 24, 2003 12:35 pm
fLOPPY, WE DO NOT HAVE TO PROVE ANYTHING TO THE WORLD. AS FAR AS I AM CONCERNED THEY CAN BOMB THEM TO THE STONEAGE IF IT SAVES ONE AMERICAN LIFE.
Mon Mar 24, 2003 12:37 pm
The fact that the Iraqi's still have electricity in Bagdad should show the type of war we are fighting. We are too soft, as for Floppy, who gives a shit what the rest of the world thinks, the reason for heavier bombing, it would force the Iraqi's to surrender quicker and save alot of our troops.
See the way I look at is a million Iraqi's arent worth the life of one American soldier. You talk about BALLS, what the frig do you know about BALLS.
See the way I look at is a million Iraqi's arent worth the life of one American soldier. You talk about BALLS, what the frig do you know about BALLS.
Mon Mar 24, 2003 12:53 pm
According to the red cross, only 1 civilian dead 32 injured in the last 48 hours of bombing on bagdhad, lights on, water able to get to homes. Boy the friggin USA are nothing but civilian slaughtering pussies.
Mon Mar 24, 2003 12:59 pm
Yes, it is. My point is that I don't think Chirac is as much of a "peace activist" as everyone makes him out to be. I'm sure he cares much more about the oil and other "economic interests" than he does peace.
Mon Mar 24, 2003 1:03 pm
Originally posted by Xenius
Yes, it is. My point is that I don't think Chirac is as much of a "peace activist" as everyone makes him out to be. I'm sure he cares much more about the oil and other "economic interests" than he does peace.
Lets not forget that Chirac is now a champion of the Muslim world, next to Osama the most used name given to Muslim newborns is Chirac.
See the kind of respect someone gets, that helps in the destruction of Israel. Long Live Chirac.
Mon Mar 24, 2003 1:13 pm
LOL, the "peace activists" name is being given to the same people who revere the name Osama. That's just plain funny.
Mon Mar 24, 2003 1:54 pm
Originally posted by COL.BUKKAKE
The fact that the Iraqi's still have electricity in Bagdad should show the type of war we are fighting.
Maybe you should check the southern cities. They have no water and no food.
Originally posted by COL.BUKKAKE
We are too soft, as for Floppy, who gives a shit what the rest of the world thinks, the reason for heavier bombing, it would force the Iraqi's to surrender quicker and save alot of our troops.
But it makes much more casualties in the civilian population. The way you talk, seems like you just dont care about these people.
Originally posted by COL.BUKKAKE
See the way I look at is a million Iraqi's arent worth the life of one American soldier. You talk about BALLS, what the frig do you know about BALLS.
What are you implying? That American people are superior over other people? When did you have your last mental check? Or did you just forgot to take your pills today?
You just dont care about the Iraqi civilians.
Mon Mar 24, 2003 2:00 pm
The US is being careful not to destroy too much of the Iraqi infrastructure for it needs most of it intact to get the oil to market. Plus, heaven forbid Haliburton has to actually spend some of the $40 Billion they received from the White House to rebuild Iraq's infrastructure after the war.
If other countries wanted to help Iraq, they wouldn't have to send any weapons to support Iraqi soldiers. They should just wait in international waters and destroy all oil vessels leaving Iraq. This would not only disrupt the ability to bring oil to market, but would cause our prices to rise, crippling our own economy. In fact that is what Russia, France, and Germany are betting on, not the attacks, just the oil expenses rising.
Read this article:
http://www.fromthewilderness.com/free/ww3/031903_perfect_storm_1.html
Saddest thing is that the US nor the world really needs the oil. Hasn't since at least to late 20's early 30's. It is just that the technology has been supressed by the Capitalist Corporate Regimes around the world. This war, just like all the comming wars is for control. Not only control of natural resources and countries jockeying for their place in the pyramid structure of power, but also of your minds.
Check out alternative energy at:
http://www.fuellesspower.com
http://www.educate-yourself.org
Iraq's (Saddam's) removal is one less threat to Israel, period. For it is not and never was never a threat to the US.
You can now return to your regularly scheduled CIA programming.
If other countries wanted to help Iraq, they wouldn't have to send any weapons to support Iraqi soldiers. They should just wait in international waters and destroy all oil vessels leaving Iraq. This would not only disrupt the ability to bring oil to market, but would cause our prices to rise, crippling our own economy. In fact that is what Russia, France, and Germany are betting on, not the attacks, just the oil expenses rising.
Read this article:
http://www.fromthewilderness.com/free/ww3/031903_perfect_storm_1.html
Saddest thing is that the US nor the world really needs the oil. Hasn't since at least to late 20's early 30's. It is just that the technology has been supressed by the Capitalist Corporate Regimes around the world. This war, just like all the comming wars is for control. Not only control of natural resources and countries jockeying for their place in the pyramid structure of power, but also of your minds.
Check out alternative energy at:
http://www.fuellesspower.com
http://www.educate-yourself.org
Iraq's (Saddam's) removal is one less threat to Israel, period. For it is not and never was never a threat to the US.
You can now return to your regularly scheduled CIA programming.
Mon Mar 24, 2003 2:05 pm
Originally posted by COL.BUKKAKE
According to the red cross, only 1 civilian dead 32 injured in the last 48 hours of bombing on bagdhad, lights on, water able to get to homes. Boy the friggin USA are nothing but civilian slaughtering pussies.
Again, you forgot to mention the Southern cities, where people have NO water, NO food and NO homes any more. The water supply has been cut off by the American troops. The American troops do not allow the red cross to deliver food to the civilians. According to the Geneve convention, the occupying forces should take care of the civilians in the territory they occupy.
Mon Mar 24, 2003 2:13 pm
As a side note: I have to agree with Floppy on this one:
"But it makes much more casualties in the civilian population. The way you talk, seems like you just dont care about these people. What are you implying? That American people are superior over other people?.....You just dont care about the Iraqi civilians."
The Iraqi people didn't ask for this war. They probably didn't even want it. But now, they will be casualties. In our last venture (Desert Storm 1) coalition forces killed something on the order of 10,000 civilians and 100,000 troops (where I have found counts, they may or may not be accurate). Not to mention the untold millions suffering due to UN sanctions (backed by the US and UK).
But hey, fuck em. The civilians were told to leave Iraq, if they didn't, thier fault for being in the way of our bombs. The soldiers at least have a duty to Saddam, although most if not all were forced into service, or at the very least coerced.
Hell yea, lets go in there and just fly all of our bombers wing to wing from the south of Iraq to the North and carpet bomb every square inch, that should soften the half-staved, malnurished, unkepmt, living in filth, anemic soldiers of Iraq even further. Hoo-Rah!!
Considering soldiers probably receive more care than the citizenry (afterall Saddam gasses his own people), the civilians would just be getting in the way of our bombs again, damn them. Damn them all to hell.
You can now return to your regularly scheduled CIA programming.
"But it makes much more casualties in the civilian population. The way you talk, seems like you just dont care about these people. What are you implying? That American people are superior over other people?.....You just dont care about the Iraqi civilians."
The Iraqi people didn't ask for this war. They probably didn't even want it. But now, they will be casualties. In our last venture (Desert Storm 1) coalition forces killed something on the order of 10,000 civilians and 100,000 troops (where I have found counts, they may or may not be accurate). Not to mention the untold millions suffering due to UN sanctions (backed by the US and UK).
But hey, fuck em. The civilians were told to leave Iraq, if they didn't, thier fault for being in the way of our bombs. The soldiers at least have a duty to Saddam, although most if not all were forced into service, or at the very least coerced.
Hell yea, lets go in there and just fly all of our bombers wing to wing from the south of Iraq to the North and carpet bomb every square inch, that should soften the half-staved, malnurished, unkepmt, living in filth, anemic soldiers of Iraq even further. Hoo-Rah!!
Considering soldiers probably receive more care than the citizenry (afterall Saddam gasses his own people), the civilians would just be getting in the way of our bombs again, damn them. Damn them all to hell.
You can now return to your regularly scheduled CIA programming.
Mon Mar 24, 2003 2:15 pm
Oh, and since this military operation is not in cooperation with the UN, it is the US and the UK that are primary responsable for the well being of the civilians, and not the UN. Off course, many UN countries are doing effords to help those people.
Mon Mar 24, 2003 2:18 pm
you guys are talking about all the world sux they just hate us that's why they're against the war...
well maybe think about WHY all the wrold hates you guys...
and i watn NO crap about someone supporting iraq with stuff that make them able to kill you guys... cause america send also weapons, don't sux about someone else to do the same shit...
btw. people, you always tell to suxers on the server to grow up... so i gonna say the same to you guys:
WAR HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH HAVING BALLS...
this is not a game like RtCW where you can say: you don't agree? lets fight it out in 1on1...
there are people dying there... that's actually the only reasson i need to be against this war...
(and you guys really need to explain me HOW those iraqi were able to capture a HELICOPTER ?? parked on the wrong spot?
)
well maybe think about WHY all the wrold hates you guys...
and i watn NO crap about someone supporting iraq with stuff that make them able to kill you guys... cause america send also weapons, don't sux about someone else to do the same shit...
btw. people, you always tell to suxers on the server to grow up... so i gonna say the same to you guys:
WAR HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH HAVING BALLS...
this is not a game like RtCW where you can say: you don't agree? lets fight it out in 1on1...
there are people dying there... that's actually the only reasson i need to be against this war...
(and you guys really need to explain me HOW those iraqi were able to capture a HELICOPTER ?? parked on the wrong spot?
)
Mon Mar 24, 2003 2:24 pm
sorry just saw Bloodbubba's thread...
bloodbubba: But hey, fuck em. The civilians were told to leave Iraq, if they didn't, thier fault for being in the way of our bombs
are you a sick mind or what? those people don't have anything else then there home, they are poor, they don't have tv on what they can see Bush saying "please leave iraq" and still: it is THEIR country, why do they have to run away? taking the risk to get a bom on there head even when they leave by bus? to get in another country.. alone, getting some food... losing everything... Americans had money enough for their war but not for the help for the damage they did whitch is THEIR responsibility...
Bin Laden warned everyone for more 11/9's... i hope you have left your country when a plane comes on your home... cause i don't wonna hear you complaining afterwards...
bloodbubba: But hey, fuck em. The civilians were told to leave Iraq, if they didn't, thier fault for being in the way of our bombs
are you a sick mind or what? those people don't have anything else then there home, they are poor, they don't have tv on what they can see Bush saying "please leave iraq" and still: it is THEIR country, why do they have to run away? taking the risk to get a bom on there head even when they leave by bus? to get in another country.. alone, getting some food... losing everything... Americans had money enough for their war but not for the help for the damage they did whitch is THEIR responsibility...
Bin Laden warned everyone for more 11/9's... i hope you have left your country when a plane comes on your home... cause i don't wonna hear you complaining afterwards...
Mon Mar 24, 2003 2:27 pm
I say that wars should be fought by the 2 assholes that start them.
Leave the civilians out of it, for they have no real say.
Leave the troops out of it, for they should only be there for defense, not for offensive posturing.
Maybe then we would really see our leaders for what they are;
Dipshits hiding behind their "shields" of invinciblity. Never really taking responsibility for their own actions that led upto the events surrounding the war.
They are bums.
They are pussies.
They are assholes.
Let THEM duke it out on CNN for the world to enjoy.
You can now return to your regularly scheduled CIA programming.
Leave the civilians out of it, for they have no real say.
Leave the troops out of it, for they should only be there for defense, not for offensive posturing.
Maybe then we would really see our leaders for what they are;
Dipshits hiding behind their "shields" of invinciblity. Never really taking responsibility for their own actions that led upto the events surrounding the war.
They are bums.
They are pussies.
They are assholes.
Let THEM duke it out on CNN for the world to enjoy.
You can now return to your regularly scheduled CIA programming.
Mon Mar 24, 2003 2:35 pm
Originally posted by [WEF]Herr Renz
sorry just saw Bloodbubba's thread...
bloodbubba: But hey, fuck em. The civilians were told to leave Iraq, if they didn't, thier fault for being in the way of our bombs
are you a sick mind or what? those people don't have anything else then there home, they are poor, they don't have tv on what they can see Bush saying "please leave iraq" and still: it is THEIR country, why do they have to run away? taking the risk to get a bom on there head even when they leave by bus? to get in another country.. alone, getting some food... losing everything... Americans had money enough for their war but not for the help for the damage they did whitch is THEIR responsibility...
Bin Laden warned everyone for more 11/9's... i hope you have left your country when a plane comes on your home... cause i don't wonna hear you complaining afterwards...
If you really believe that I meant that as anything other than sarcasm towards the attitudes of the people on this thread, you haven't read any of my other posts.
I completely agree with you.
This war will result in many more civillian casualties, as all wars do. They do not deserve this. They did not ask for this. Unfortunately, leaders do not settle wars themselves. They all hide behind their armies, in their luxurious palaces and homes, getting updates from their military generals. They have no real stake. They accept "limited civillian casualties" as a result of their actions, but receive no punishment, for afterall civillian deaths nothing more than the "price for war", human resources to be sacrificed upon the altar of "great and noble causes".
This type of thinking is enough to make me puke.
Afterall, what part of "thou shall not kill" do people not fucking understand?
You can now return to your regularly scheduled CIA programming.