Anouther NASA boomsticker
64 posts
• Page 3 of 5 • 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
- LordShard
Re: Re: Anouther NASA boomsticker
A word I made up.Originally posted by Tommy Boy
what is a boomsticker?

- hightimber
-
- Posts: 1157
- Joined: Sun Dec 01, 2002 5:17 pm
- Location: Colorado Springs, CO
dB, LordShard is correct in that NASA has had its share of blunders and they're high-profile due to the cost of the projects and the blood-thirsty media's desire to report bad news.Originally posted by deathBOB
Heloooo!!! Government agency! How much do you really expect out of them?
That being said, I agree with hightimber, NASA has contributed so much, why do we dwell on a little satellite?
As a spoiled society, we're only interested in bitching about things we see as negatives. NASA has delivered many, many, many more dollars in spin-offs than they have ever spent on missions. Short-sighted people will never understand that and we shouldn't waste our breath trying to educate folks who would rather stick their collective heads in the sand.
A lot of the technology needed to build the PCs we play games on today was an offshoot of technology that NASA created in order to send men to the moon in the 60s and build our shuttle fleet in the 70s. The nature of space travel is that we need to build things as small, light, and as reliable as possible (read: miniaturization). All of this technology trickles down into the electronics we use each and every hour of each and every day.

- LordShard
THe miniturization used in our PCs wasn't because of NASA, it was because the tech firms like AMD, Intel, ATI, Nvidia wanted to make smaller chips so they could make faster components. The only usefull thing nasa has come up with (I beleave it was nasa) was the Cell phone (evil!) and microwaves, or something like that.Originally posted by hightimber
dB, LordShard is correct in that NASA has had its share of blunders and they're high-profile due to the cost of the projects and the blood-thirsty media's desire to report bad news.
As a spoiled society, we're only interested in bitching about things we see as negatives. NASA has delivered many, many, many more dollars in spin-offs than they have ever spent on missions. Short-sighted people will never understand that and we shouldn't waste our breath trying to educate folks who would rather stick their collective heads in the sand.
A lot of the technology needed to build the PCs we play games on today was an offshoot of technology that NASA created in order to send men to the moon in the 60s and build our shuttle fleet in the 70s. The nature of space travel is that we need to build things as small, light, and as reliable as possible (read: miniaturization). All of this technology trickles down into the electronics we use each and every hour of each and every day.
- SGT DEVILDOG
-
- Posts: 1056
- Joined: Thu Oct 02, 2003 3:02 am
- Location: Washington State
What about Tang and Velcro:roll:

[img]DevilDog
" We are not retreating. We are attacking in a different direction" Chesty Puller...USMC
- BladeRunner
-
- Posts: 2308
- Joined: Tue Dec 24, 2002 9:44 am
- Location: Bristol, Virginia
Originally posted by LordShard
THe miniturization used in our PCs wasn't because of NASA, it was because the tech firms like AMD, Intel, ATI, Nvidia wanted to make smaller chips so they could make faster components. The only usefull thing nasa has come up with (I beleave it was nasa) was the Cell phone (evil!) and microwaves, or something like that.
Some interesting reading here:
http://www1.jsc.nasa.gov/er/seh/spinoff.html

"Aim small, miss small" The Patriot
"Slow is smooth, smooth is fast" Bob Lee Swagger
"There is but one path, we kill them all" Spartacus:Blood and Sand
"Slow is smooth, smooth is fast" Bob Lee Swagger
"There is but one path, we kill them all" Spartacus:Blood and Sand
- BladeRunner
-
- Posts: 2308
- Joined: Tue Dec 24, 2002 9:44 am
- Location: Bristol, Virginia
Another page about NASA spinoffs:
http://www.sti.nasa.gov/tto/spinselect.html
imo, if NASA had never been many things we use today
would not be here.
And another one with more stuff:
http://www.nasa.gov/audience/forstudents/k-4/home/spinoffs_feature_k_4.html
I think NASA has more spinoff stuff than anyone else I can
think of.
http://www.sti.nasa.gov/tto/spinselect.html
imo, if NASA had never been many things we use today
would not be here.

And another one with more stuff:
http://www.nasa.gov/audience/forstudents/k-4/home/spinoffs_feature_k_4.html

I think NASA has more spinoff stuff than anyone else I can
think of.
"Aim small, miss small" The Patriot
"Slow is smooth, smooth is fast" Bob Lee Swagger
"There is but one path, we kill them all" Spartacus:Blood and Sand
"Slow is smooth, smooth is fast" Bob Lee Swagger
"There is but one path, we kill them all" Spartacus:Blood and Sand
- LordShard
Allot of the stuff on the second link isn't bein used anymore/being phased out. When is the last time you saw an ear thermoniter? WHen is the last time you've had edible toothpaste? Or when is the last time you've need a "space pen". Although I used to have a "space pen" I never needed to use it, and it was eventually stolen. >.<
- BladeRunner
-
- Posts: 2308
- Joined: Tue Dec 24, 2002 9:44 am
- Location: Bristol, Virginia
Spinoffs from the spinoff maybe. i don't have any links for
those
Most inventions are build from other inventions.
I like the one about bar codes, I never knew that NASA
did that one.
It would be a different world today if we didn't have bar codes.

those

Most inventions are build from other inventions.

I like the one about bar codes, I never knew that NASA
did that one.
It would be a different world today if we didn't have bar codes.

"Aim small, miss small" The Patriot
"Slow is smooth, smooth is fast" Bob Lee Swagger
"There is but one path, we kill them all" Spartacus:Blood and Sand
"Slow is smooth, smooth is fast" Bob Lee Swagger
"There is but one path, we kill them all" Spartacus:Blood and Sand
- hightimber
-
- Posts: 1157
- Joined: Sun Dec 01, 2002 5:17 pm
- Location: Colorado Springs, CO
Some people, even when presented with facts, just refuse to believe.
Bill Clinton: I DID NOT have sex with that woman.
Monica: Mmm mm mmm
More spinoffs
Bill Clinton: I DID NOT have sex with that woman.
Monica: Mmm mm mmm
More spinoffs

- LordShard
I didn't say I didn't beleave, but when a place like NASA has 2 major screw ups a year, wher eare the people being fired?Originally posted by hightimber
Some people, even when presented with facts, just refuse to believe.
Bill Clinton: I DID NOT have sex with that woman.
Monica: Mmm mm mmm
More spinoffs
More importantlly, why isn't NASA making money off these spinoffs? o_O
- SandStorm
Originally posted by hightimber
Sometimes people hit a hot button with me. Categorizing all NASA people as morons is more than I can ignore.
Your not alone hightimber.
I live 5 minutes from the Johnson Space Center and our community and the city of Houston takes great pride in NASA. One of the astronauts killed in the Columbia tragedy, who's family we are good friends with, lived a few houses down from me and to hear a statment as such angers me immensely.
Lordshard, I know (I hope) your not trying to piss anyone off but why so much negativity towards NASA? Because one satellite was lost during re-entry?
Re: Re: Re: Anouther NASA boomsticker
Originally posted by LordShard
A word I made up.![]()
Ohhhh, I have never heard it before, and now know why...

64 posts
• Page 3 of 5 • 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 29 guests