3.86 ghz X6800 vs. 3.05 ghz Fx-62
5 posts
• Page 1 of 1
- CreepingCharlie
-
- Posts: 1105
- Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2005 1:32 pm
- Location: Northern Virginia/ North Dakota
3.86 ghz X6800 vs. 3.05 ghz Fx-62
by CreepingCharlie » Wed Aug 02, 2006 3:39 pm
Army Strong
I'm a pilot
UND Fighting Sioux!
I'm a pilot
UND Fighting Sioux!
Originally posted by TChinnyChin
Just like in game Charlie leaves in a chopper without any infantry again.
- cavalierlwt
-
- Posts: 2840
- Joined: Thu Feb 13, 2003 12:54 pm
by cavalierlwt » Wed Aug 02, 2006 4:20 pm
Core2 looks amazing. Intel apparently is sick of eating AMDs dust all these years. AMD won't go out of business, but this certainly goes a long way toward driving them down into a hole.
Failing to plead
with a throat full of dust
Life falls asleep
in a fetal position.
with a throat full of dust
Life falls asleep
in a fetal position.
by Evan » Wed Aug 02, 2006 5:18 pm
Originally posted by cavalierlwt
Core2 looks amazing. Intel apparently is sick of eating AMDs dust all these years. AMD won't go out of business, but this certainly goes a long way toward driving them down into a hole.
Intel is nowhere near driving AMD into a hole.
.- cavalierlwt
-
- Posts: 2840
- Joined: Thu Feb 13, 2003 12:54 pm
by cavalierlwt » Wed Aug 02, 2006 6:14 pm
Let's talk in 18 months. I think Intel is going to take back some market share. I'm generally an AMD fanboy, but Intel beat AMD at their own game with this one, and this is the first time I can ever recall seeing the more powerful Intel chip cheaper than the AMD counterpart.
Failing to plead
with a throat full of dust
Life falls asleep
in a fetal position.
with a throat full of dust
Life falls asleep
in a fetal position.
5 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 20 guests