Tomorrow = End of 2 week Ban

Keek tomorrow is the last day of 2 week ban so will you be taking my ban off tomorrow?

[|RS|SquareBallz]

I think he has it marked on his calendar

lol - I think not - if I didnt remind him he probably would never take it off

You sure are a whining little bitch!

[King]

i bet you that $1000 (US) donation i made personally to the Keekanoo's Kid's foundation helps sway his decision.... to not let you back

Sludge

[(SEETHER)]

If he does life the ban, you will probably be watched fairly closely. So behave.

I'd rather him lift the ban and not life the ban

[^wo0t]

In defense of Trever, I've seen other players just screwing around (probably because they were bored) and not helping out their team and they weren't banned They also weren't quite as obvious as trever usually is, but I thought the admins were omniscient Now I figure Trever was probably banned for tking, but I remember Keek posting about him in general just screwing off as support for his ban decision. If Trever was not tking (and it prob wasn't technically tking, but shooting 1 shot at his teammates), would he have been banned?

[FigoJudas]

Amen!
but I thought your ban ended yesterday or 2 days ago, some players saw the console message of: Treven bann finished

The ban was lifted as of 4pm est Sunday, Trever. Please don't screw around on the server.

Wo0t.... the Beach admins arn't perfect or omniscient. We are however fairly good at communicating to each other about problems. I mentioned in a previous thread the particulars of Trevers banning reasons; please read them before making assumptive remarks. It is not a policy to ban people at the Beach without a very good reason, or, in the case of Trever, biggy-size that on the plurals.

Trev, your chaotic and percocious personality endears you to a lot of people, including myself. But please don't bleed people, tk people, block people, or be a closet stalker at the server mmm k?

[aphid]

Originally posted by Keekanoo
Wo0t.... the Beach admins arn't perfect or omniscient. We are however fairly good at communicating to each other about problems. I mentioned in a previous thread the particulars of Trevers banning reasons; please read them before making assumptive remarks. It is not a policy to ban people at the Beach without a very good reason, or, in the case of Trever, biggy-size that on the plurals.

To whom it may concern,

Consider this post my formal request to get a larger rolleyes emoticon on the forum. Thank you for your time.

[aphid]

Hee we go. Add this one...

[SavageParrot]

Originally posted by ^wo0t
If Trever was not tking (and it prob wasn't technically tking, but shooting 1 shot at his teammates), would he have been banned?

That's what he was doing, he was just taking one shot with a flamer or a mauser, which fucks you up good and proper.

[^wo0t]

Originally posted by Keekanoo
I mentioned in a previous thread the particulars of Trevers banning reasons; please read them before making assumptive remarks.

You actually convinced me to find that thread which was quite the list of disruptive behaviors. Since Trever did not come to his defense after your list, I assume those all to be truth (I should have anyway considering the source of credibility). It just sounded harsh considering how much of a harmless transient trever really is. I was wrong in my assumptive remark, you are right as usual, solomon.

Now those teammates that have no idea how to check their fire actually get on my nerves more. Would it be unreasonable to "set g_friendlyfire 2"? I only wish it would return twice the health damage to the damager, rather than 1:1. Hear my cries sten-god...

I still can't believe you said you guys weren't perfect

Test