Sat Jan 15, 2005 9:20 pm
Sat Jan 15, 2005 9:29 pm
Originally posted by LordShard
Can anyone find the article CERN made about not being able to measure anything smaller than a planck length because the instumentation would iether be so masive it collapses into a black hole or is so large that the speed of light isn't fast enough to traverse it's relays?
Sat Jan 15, 2005 9:33 pm
Originally posted by Stl Lunatic
:eek:![]()
Sat Jan 15, 2005 9:47 pm
I just thought that to be a funny question to ask...thats all. Sorry if I offended you...Originally posted by LordShard
:rant:![]()
Sat Jan 15, 2005 9:59 pm
Originally posted by LordShard
Can anyone find the article CERN made about not being able to measure anything smaller than a planck length because the instumentation would iether be so masive it collapses into a black hole or is so large that the speed of light isn't fast enough to traverse it's relays?
Sat Jan 15, 2005 10:04 pm
Sat Jan 15, 2005 10:55 pm
Sat Jan 15, 2005 10:58 pm
Originally posted by Chacal
It's not CERN, it's CalTech
(Xavier Calmet, Michael Graesser and Stephen Hsu).
You'll probably get a Nobel prize for your innovative use of quantum physics in justifying Spam.
Sun Jan 16, 2005 4:15 am
Sun Jan 16, 2005 4:34 am
Sun Jan 16, 2005 5:35 am
Sun Jan 16, 2005 6:25 am
I looked it up on CERN that if you have half a gram of anti-matter it would be equal to the bomb dropped on Hiroshima. =OOriginally posted by MoJo
Yeah Totally Correctamundo![]()