Quake 4 multiplayer videos
14 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Re: Re: Quake 4 multiplayer videos
Originally posted by Rand0m
:eek:insane graphics
As sad as this may sound, it looks like nothing special graphics wise. At least in multiplayer.

- Killer Mike
- RTCW Admin
-
- Posts: 930
- Joined: Sun Oct 20, 2002 8:42 pm
Re: Re: Re: Quake 4 multiplayer videos
Originally posted by Evan
As sad as this may sound, it looks like nothing special graphics wise. At least in multiplayer.
But then again, it does.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Quake 4 multiplayer videos
Originally posted by Killer Mike
But then again, it does.
Compared to what? I've seen UT2K4 maps that look better than that.
Not to mention UT2K7 itself using the Unreal 3 engine..

Re: Re: Re: Quake 4 multiplayer videos
Originally posted by Evan
As sad as this may sound, it looks like nothing special graphics wise. At least in multiplayer.
from my point of view they are good. seeing as I only play wolf right now haha. My computer cant handle everything maxed on games like bf2 and stuff, so I dont even bother buying games like ut2k7 or whatever. I'll buy a new rig sometime in the end of next year though.
- SkiloDog2000
-
- Posts: 1931
- Joined: Sun Dec 21, 2003 1:05 am
- Location: Cape Cod, Mass
meh
quakewars doesent excite me too much either
fighting as an alien doesent appeal to me
i wanna be a nazi
quakewars doesent excite me too much either
fighting as an alien doesent appeal to me
i wanna be a nazi
- LordShard
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Quake 4 multiplayer videos
Looks better than half life 2.....Originally posted by Evan
Compared to what? I've seen UT2K4 maps that look better than that.
Not to mention UT2K7 itself using the Unreal 3 engine..
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Quake 4 multiplayer videos
Originally posted by LordShard
Looks better than half life 2.....
burn? I think that is a burn......

BURN!!!!!!

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Quake 4 multiplayer videos
Originally posted by LordShard
Looks better than half life 2.....
Comparing apples to oranges.
HL2 has more realistic graphics. Q4 has more plastic like (fake) graphics.

I think both of those games suck. I hate them both, mainly because, well they just suck mwahaha. Now, bf2 I can bare with because that game has some seriously awsome grafixs. Star Trek Elite Force is also ran by the Unreal 3 Engine, but it still doesn't look that great. I wanna be a Nazi also, I don't want to be a alien that looks like a deformed monkey.

- oxy
Originally posted by pressure
I think both of those games suck. I hate them both, mainly because, well they just suck mwahaha. Now, bf2 I can bare with because that game has some seriously awsome grafixs. Star Trek Elite Force is also ran by the Unreal 3 Engine, but it still doesn't look that great. I wanna be a Nazi also, I don't want to be a alien that looks like a deformed monkey.
Somebody shoot this guy. He just said Star Trek Elite Force used the Unreal 3 engine. It used the Quake 3 engine...horribly
let us compare:


I'm about to cry.
Originally posted by pressure
I think both of those games suck. I hate them both, mainly because, well they just suck mwahaha. Now, bf2 I can bare with because that game has some seriously awsome grafixs. Star Trek Elite Force is also ran by the Unreal 3 Engine, but it still doesn't look that great. I wanna be a Nazi also, I don't want to be a alien that looks like a deformed monkey.
As Oxy said: Quake 3, not Unreal 3.

- beavermatic
-
- Posts: 27
- Joined: Sun Mar 27, 2005 11:49 pm
- Location: Newark, NJ
I'll believe UT2007 will look that good when i see it....
until i can play it, it remains nothing more than screenshots and crap quality .avi's to look at
until i can play it, it remains nothing more than screenshots and crap quality .avi's to look at
I be Strokin'!!!
14 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 21 guests