So I finnaly got power back yesterday

by **ShellShock** » Mon Sep 22, 2003 9:46 am

School's out today, I'm still recovering from a bout with the flu, and the Redskins lost in OT.

by **Xenius** » Mon Sep 22, 2003 9:50 am

At least you don't have school! That's a whole day you get to play BF.

by **Buliwyf** » Mon Sep 22, 2003 10:33 am

Originally posted by ShellShock
School's out today, I'm still recovering from a bout with the flu, and the Redskins lost in OT.

Redskins = HAHHAHAHAHAHA

Giants >Redskins

sorry, grew up in NJ, and now live in VA. I will NEVER be a skins fan.

by **Mighty Mazz** » Mon Sep 22, 2003 11:32 am

Yeah OT blows balls in my opinion. Was a good game tho.

They need to give at least one possesion to other team, to make it even. As it is now its pretty much the luck of the coin toss.

Well at least u can look forward to the Patriots owning the Reds next week.

by **Buliwyf** » Mon Sep 22, 2003 12:00 pm

Originally posted by Musashi X
Yeah OT blows balls in my opinion. Was a good game tho.

They need to give at least one possesion to other team, to make it even. As it is now its pretty much the luck of the coin toss.

Well at least u can look forward to the Patriots owning the Reds next week.

make it even? it is even. The teams that cry it isn't even, is their own fault for letting it get to overtime in the first place.

by **Mighty Mazz** » Mon Sep 22, 2003 12:13 pm

Originally posted by buliwyf
make it even? it is even. The teams that cry it isn't even, is their own fault for letting it get to overtime in the first place.

Yeah thats just crap. Lets just take NY v Wash for example. The Reds made a hell of a comeback. And heres the key word TIED it. Both scores being even each team should receive an equal/even chance of winning in OT. It wouldnt be so bad if field goals werent allowed.

But dont you agree it would make more sense to give the other team one possesion to try and answer back. If the def can stop em then its over and no excuses. As it stands now the losser of the toss has 2x as much work cut out for them.

Nothing against the giants just disagree with OT in general. Like intentional walking in baseball. Or De La Hoya vs Mosley II, what was that anyway :rotflmao:

by **ShellShock** » Mon Sep 22, 2003 4:23 pm

I just coughed up something nasty a minute ago. I hope thats normal....

by **Camel toe joe** » Mon Sep 22, 2003 4:38 pm

Originally posted by ShellShock
I just coughed up something nasty a minute ago. I hope thats normal....

as long as it doesn't move by itself I think you'll be ok, I'm not a doctor but I play one sometimes in BF1942

by **teh_funk** » Mon Sep 22, 2003 7:06 pm

Originally posted by Musashi X
Yeah thats just crap. Lets just take NY v Wash for example. The Reds made a hell of a comeback. And heres the key word TIED it. Both scores being even each team should receive an equal/even chance of winning in OT. It wouldnt be so bad if field goals werent allowed.

But dont you agree it would make more sense to give the other team one possesion to try and answer back. If the def can stop em then its over and no excuses. As it stands now the losser of the toss has 2x as much work cut out for them.

Nothing against the giants just disagree with OT in general. Like intentional walking in baseball. Or De La Hoya vs Mosley II, what was that anyway

Hmm what word fits with that fight.

Maybe.. Boring? :\ Can't believe I stayed up that late for it.

by **WDPsellout** » Mon Sep 22, 2003 7:46 pm

I heard a while back the NFL is going to try to adapt the college style football overtime, where each team gets a posession i think on the 40 or so yard line, and try to score, but if one team scores and the other team counters and doesn't the first team win. But if both teams score, it starts all over again.

So I finnaly got power back yesterday

So I finnaly got power back yesterday

Re: So I finnaly got power back yesterday

Who is online