new matrix

by **Sir Loin** » Thu Nov 06, 2003 3:05 am

i just saw the new matrix movie, and it blew ass. I started laughing during the movie because it was that bad. Anyone else see it and think it was a horrible movie?? Drop Dead Fred was a better movie.

by **LeVar Burton** » Thu Nov 06, 2003 3:30 am

I agree. Here's how I feel about the trilogy: the Wachowski brothers wrote the first one, it was an incredible success, they dished out two more scripts with a million holes shrouded in ambiguous mumbo jumbo. I think alot of people liked the first one so much, they won't admit the sequels were subpar.

by **Destructor** » Thu Nov 06, 2003 5:25 am

i kinda thought the first one was dumb. too many special affects and not enough closure. and for some reason i still see Bill every time i see keanu reeves.

by **Kurith** » Thu Nov 06, 2003 6:54 am

I didn't like either Matrix movies. So we are all happy! Wooo

by **Folic_Acid** » Thu Nov 06, 2003 8:39 am

I thought Revolutions was garbage - answered zero questions. IMHO, they should've just stopped at the first movie.

by **-HaVoC-** » Thu Nov 06, 2003 8:55 am

Wow, I thought it was awesome. The first movie obviously was a fabulous script and had some ground breaking effects. The second one bored me to death. But the third one I though was fantastic. I can't wait to see it again.

by **Stephanie** » Thu Nov 06, 2003 9:17 am

I seen it yesterday, it was okay, but what I didnt. understand was if NEO was the only one who could defeat "THE SMITH".... Then why would he go and make a deal with the machines??

"SMITH'' can take over machines......, NEO can defeat the "SMITH"........ but not the machines??..... kindof seemed that they messed up the story there,why not defeat the machines then "SMITH"???...... unless I am wrong , please feel to correct me and make me understand.....

:help:

Over all I the movie was okay, in my opinion the first two were great:)

by **-HaVoC-** » Thu Nov 06, 2003 9:22 am

I get the feeling some things were left open for future endeavors. Or maybe it was also intended to make a statement about the coexistence of them both.

They referenced the machines feeling love and other emotions when neo was in the train station. It was never stated that the machines would be destroyed. Just that the war would be over.

by **Sir Loin** » Thu Nov 06, 2003 1:52 pm

So is neo dead??? What the fuck happened to him. I think this movie was a cross between mech warriors, aladdin, and superman, which cannot be good.

by **(>Tool<)** » Thu Nov 13, 2003 6:21 pm

I liked it alot.

by **Gusbenz3000** » Tue Nov 18, 2003 5:59 pm

It was crap, to much crap. It tried to hard to be good, with all the crap that was put in and long lines. Good vs Evil, without Good there can not be evil, all that crap. Then the big gun fights...uhhhh. Almost bad as reloaded.

by **Tour of Duty** » Tue Nov 18, 2003 6:09 pm

Originally posted by Gusbenz3000
Good vs Evil, without Good there can not be evil, all that crap. Then the big gun fights...uhhhh. Almost bad as reloaded.

Reloaded wasn't crap. Only the thing that evrything went far more easier than in part I sucked.
But a movie doesn't suck if they use some kind of 'philosophy'. No Evil without Good.
Or should we return to the movies where they only use gunfights? And that you, after 5 minutes of watching it, allready know how it ends?
I think some of you guys are too lazy too actually THINK about a story. And don't criticize it when you don't understand it, or criticize it when somebody else doesn't like it. Allmost all sequels are not better than part I, but Reloaded and Revolutions aren't that bad :confused:

by **Gusbenz3000** » Tue Nov 18, 2003 6:19 pm

Originally posted by Tour of Duty
Reloaded wasn't crap. Only the thing that evrything went far more easier than in part I sucked.
But a movie doesn't suck if they use some kind of 'philosophy'. No Evil without Good.
Or should we return to the movies where they only use gunfights? And that you, after 5 minutes of watching it, allready know how it ends?
I think some of you guys are too lazy too actually THINK about a story. And don't criticize it when you don't understand it, or criticize it when somebody else doesn't like it. Allmost all sequels are not better than part I, but Reloaded and Revolutions aren't that bad

I got the story and I just think the Wachowski brothers try to hard to make the movie something it's not.

Reloaded was crap. I didn't like it at all. One movie was fine. I don't think that there had to be three...

by **(SEETHER)** » Wed Nov 19, 2003 4:51 pm

I guess no one realizes that the matrix was originally going to be a trilogy from the beginning.

:flame:

S.S.SEETHER

by **Tour of Duty** » Wed Nov 19, 2003 5:17 pm

I watched part 1 again, and it is the best part of the 3.
But it's a classic, so you can't compair Reloaded and Revolution with it. Besides, Matrix 1 was a totally new phenomenon, so that's why it's so populair right now.
With part 2 and 3, you don't really have 'new things'. Only a story, and special effects.
But I still like them all 3

new matrix

new matrix

Who is online