How many WMD's need be discovered

by **Face** » Tue Jul 06, 2004 12:35 pm

Originally posted by Keekanoo
... and Saddam was put in place by the Americans to keep that whole thing going).

Absolutely wrong. Saddam Hussein was in power for 35 years. Long before that war. And he wasn't put into place by anyone in the US. He was a local leader/thug and he and his cousin usurped the government - his cousin was President and Saddam headed up the "secret police." His cousin was a puppet and Saddam was the real one with power - and feared by all. Then one day he told his cousin You aren't pesident anymore, I am. And that was that.

Originally posted by Keekanoo
... but he did have fairly good rights to defend the soverign boundaries of his country in attacking Kuwait. The facts are there, nothing more.

So was it Saddam protecting the sovereignty of Iraq when his troops gunned down a crowd of protesting Kuwaiti women?

by **JimmyTango** » Tue Jul 06, 2004 12:41 pm

Originally posted by RCglider

JT writes with juvenile tendencies, that's why I doubt he's old enough to vote. His admiration of Michael Moore pretty much says it all.

LOL. Seriously, keep it up. You are very funny. Especially when you claim liberals are vicius and are the verbal attackers, then proceed to do it in the same thread. i got a good chuckle fromt hat one.

Sad you can not read well or understand English well, since I in no way 'admire' Micheal Moore and have always stated you need to cut out the liberal thumping. But that is to be expected from you, someoen who can not even fathom Limbaugh doing what Moore does(which is another thing I have always stated).

Oh yeah, please do explain how Blair has no idea of all these WMD you claim we keep finding in iraq. Please do explain this. Where is the huge press announcement from Bush? Do you lack common sense so much that these two key things have no dawned on you? Or maybe it is that evil liberal media, and third rate websites have the TRUE stories!!!

by **Face** » Tue Jul 06, 2004 12:58 pm

Come on Tango, you are the resident troll and you know it. At least own up to it, unlike the usual Liberalcrats who act the worlves in sheeps' clothing.

by **Ryan** » Tue Jul 06, 2004 1:00 pm

Get your last words in! This one is getting closed.

by **JimmyTango** » Tue Jul 06, 2004 1:04 pm

Originally posted by Face
Come on Tango, you are the resident troll and you know it. At least own up to it, unlike the usual Liberalcrats who act the worlves in sheeps' clothing.

Actually, I have stated numerous times that I post a certain way, as do others that are usually the first to cry about me since I do not believe as they do. Oh, and yes, this includes you.

Ho about thoise WMD, all over the place. A third rate website says so(no matter no annoucement from the president, and Blair saying not have been found nor are likely to be found).

Go third rate websites(and those that use them to support stupid arguements)!!!!

by **SavageParrot** » Tue Jul 06, 2004 1:42 pm

Originally posted by Ryan
Get your last words in! This one is getting closed.

Banana
arsebiscuits
and
pontificates

Whew, I sure am glad I got those in on time.

by **Colonel Ingus** » Tue Jul 06, 2004 1:50 pm

I have got admit I am impressed by Parrot getting pontificates into the conversation.

Surely if he cogitates upon it sufficiently he should arrive at an elucidative solution.

by **COL.BUKKAKE** » Tue Jul 06, 2004 2:07 pm

Come now Jimmy, even you can admit, that our educational system, from grammer school up to our Universities, Media(excluding Fox), and many Newspapers, Magazines, lean heavily to the left. So the way I see it, those that lean towards the right, seem to be forming their own opinions, researching and making rational arguments. (albeit, name calling is childish)
Instead of conforming to the majority of the teachings that are shoved in our faces from birth.

Answer this question Jimmy: Why, if your able, are some the reasons you will be voting for Kerry? What does he stand for that makes you feel he can be the next President of the USA? Or does it not matter what he stands for, or what he represents, or if he's a good man, or a man we can respect, Or is it " Anybody But Bush"

For some reason, I think its the latter, I think I could put one of my kids shit-filled diapers on the Democrat ticket and that would get the majority of the Dems votes.

by **shockwave203** » Tue Jul 06, 2004 2:18 pm

Blair says WMD may NEVER be found

Just like Jimmy already said, Blair hasn't stated any were ever found, meanwhile people keep linking to unkown websites and media which have been shown they weren't credible in the past.

If the leader of the second largest contributor to the war has stated "we haven't found them, and we may never find them" just TODAY, how can you people still rant on about how they've been found?

by **Mighty Mazz** » Tue Jul 06, 2004 2:27 pm

Originally posted by Ryan
Get your last words in! This one is getting closed.

Noooooooooooooooooooo.

Watching political Ping-Pong is fun.

Besides you just know these guys love arguing.

by **Face** » Tue Jul 06, 2004 2:29 pm

Originally posted by JimmyTango
Go third rate websites(and those that use them to support stupid arguements)!!!!

Like moveon.org and such?

by **Jeffro** » Tue Jul 06, 2004 2:32 pm

Being bipartisan, I have no idea who is correct...

:confused:

by **Face** » Tue Jul 06, 2004 2:33 pm

All in all, the great thing about the ECGN community is that even with threads like these, we can all still jump on ECGN#1 and spot arty for each other, relinquish a plane for each other, repair each other's tanks, and call each other "idiots" without realizing that "he's on Teamspeak, too"

by **Keekanoo** » Tue Jul 06, 2004 2:34 pm

Originally posted by Ryan
Get your last words in! This one is getting closed.

Why? Argument fosters thought. Argument by nature, especially on our lay-person level, is tinged with emotion. However, I don't see any ultra foul-mouthing going on, so why close the thread?

by **Ryan** » Tue Jul 06, 2004 2:36 pm

Originally posted by Keekanoo
Why? Argument fosters thought. Argument by nature, especially on our lay-person level, is tinged with emotion. However, I don't see any ultra foul-mouthing going on, so why close the thread?

Because im sick of all the Iraq / Political threads. Not to mention the amount of bashing in these threads.

Been debating a 'political' section, a special private section for you guys to bach eachother to your hearts content, telling eachother that they're wrong and you're right. I know quite a few of you would have a field day in there.

How many WMD's need be discovered

Who is online