How long before John Edwards is implicated....

Off topic, but don't go too far overboard - after all, we are watching...heh.
CharlieDontSurf

Postby CharlieDontSurf » Thu Jul 08, 2004 8:39 am

IRT Colonel Savage: Please review RCGlider's post and that is an example of a morally bankrupt individual who is lucky not to be imprisoned for treason, rape or outright corruption. So while George Bush may have some skeletons in his closet he looks like Billy Graham next to Clinton as far as morality in the White House.

IRT RCGlider: Awesome post man.

User avatar
Posts: 1774
Joined: Tue Nov 05, 2002 5:17 pm
Location: Land of the Shemales.

Postby JimmyTango » Thu Jul 08, 2004 8:44 am

Originally posted by COL.BUKKAKE
Better ask your dad why Kennedy beat Nixon........Oh if Nixon only stayed away from the television.

I think every women in the nation voted that year.:D


I need to ask my daddy? Ok.

Kennedy did nto win because he looked better, but because his daddy baught the election.

User avatar
Posts: 1774
Joined: Tue Nov 05, 2002 5:17 pm
Location: Land of the Shemales.

Postby JimmyTango » Thu Jul 08, 2004 8:56 am

Originally posted by CharlieDontSurf


IRT RCGlider: Awesome post man.


Which just shows that your claim of this great 'theory' is nothing but bullshit, and you just wanted to start a post to rip on Edwards. It has been clear from the get go(mentioning he is a Democrat as a reason, then not mentioning it again in your replies), denying it is just plain stupid.

Colonel Savage

Postby Colonel Savage » Thu Jul 08, 2004 9:27 am

Originally posted by CharlieDontSurf
IRT Colonel Savage: Please review RCGlider's post and that is an example of a morally bankrupt individual who is lucky not to be imprisoned for treason, rape or outright corruption. So while George Bush may have some skeletons in his closet he looks like Billy Graham next to Clinton as far as morality in the White House.

IRT RCGlider: Awesome post man.


Out of curiosity, where does election tampering figure in?

You won't find me holding Clinton up as a paragon of virtue. But let's not fool ourselves into thinking that he was any worse than any who came before him or will follow after.

CharlieDontSurf

Postby CharlieDontSurf » Thu Jul 08, 2004 9:38 am

Clinton was the worst man to occupy that job IMO. Election tampering was accepting campaign donations from Communist China in return for the transfer of high tech satellite material, nuclear technology and God knows what else, as well as abuses domestically in regards to campaign finance violations.

Colonel Savage

Postby Colonel Savage » Thu Jul 08, 2004 9:44 am

Campaign finance violations? Isn't that an accepted political strategy down there yet? Every president I've lived through since Nixon seems to have been guilty of that...

COL.BUKKAKE

Postby COL.BUKKAKE » Thu Jul 08, 2004 9:57 am

Man thats some list; He turned the White House into the Corleone's.

"Monica, I'll make you an offer you cant refuse, lick my balls"

*above to be read in Vito Corleone voice.

User avatar
Posts: 988
Joined: Tue Jan 28, 2003 6:20 pm
Location: Texas DFW (Arlington)

Postby Sir Loin » Thu Jul 08, 2004 10:06 am

bukkake.....you have the funniest posts ever....keep'em coming..
When the boogeyman goes to sleep every night, he checks his closet for Chuck Norris.

Posts: 551
Joined: Fri Mar 28, 2003 5:18 pm

Postby RCglider » Thu Jul 08, 2004 11:01 am

Originally posted by Colonel Savage
Campaign finance violations? Isn't that an accepted political strategy down there yet? Every president I've lived through since Nixon seems to have been guilty of that...



Maybe, but not from the Communist Chinese.


I'm still wondering what medication finally worked on that strange sore Clinton had on his lip for so long.

CharlieDontSurf

Postby CharlieDontSurf » Thu Jul 08, 2004 11:08 am

I think he stopped smoking Tuna flavored cigars. Damn; just damn.

Posts: 551
Joined: Fri Mar 28, 2003 5:18 pm

Postby RCglider » Thu Jul 08, 2004 11:29 am

They did wonders with his red nose too.

CharlieDontSurf

Postby CharlieDontSurf » Fri Jul 09, 2004 2:40 pm

Originally posted by JimmyTango
Which just shows that your claim of this great 'theory' is nothing but bullshit, and you just wanted to start a post to rip on Edwards. It has been clear from the get go(mentioning he is a Democrat as a reason, then not mentioning it again in your replies), denying it is just plain stupid.


I mentioned he was a Dem from the get go and got called on it. I answered yes that Dems are liberal and IMO tend to view immorality as okay because 'everyone does it'. I'm 36 years old and have seen quite a bit of the world bhaving been in the military and have met alot of people. Overall Democrats strike me as being more apt to flirt with immorality and then blame others for their mistakes.

I also said that Republicans also have affairs. When you ask 90% of the people who is more likely to commit adultery 'a liberal' or 'a conservative' they will pick the liberal. Conservatives usually have the better family values, are more likely to have both parents around (hence a more stable childhood for the kids), and are usually better off financially.

So, reread the post before you call people stupid. Or as the saying goes 'better to be thought the fool, than open your mouth and remove all doubt'. Nuff said.

User avatar
Posts: 1774
Joined: Tue Nov 05, 2002 5:17 pm
Location: Land of the Shemales.

Postby JimmyTango » Fri Jul 09, 2004 3:46 pm

Originally posted by CharlieDontSurf
I also said that Republicans also have affairs. When you ask 90% of the people who is more likely to commit adultery 'a liberal' or 'a conservative' they will pick the liberal. Conservatives usually have the better family values, are more likely to have both parents around (hence a more stable childhood for the kids), and are usually better off financially.


Interesting stats. 90% is a lot, isn't it? nice job completely making it up, BTW.

Originally posted by CharlieDontSurf


So, reread the post before you call people stupid. Or as the saying goes 'better to be thought the fool, than open your mouth and remove all doubt'. Nuff said.


Since I said denying it is plain stupid, and not that you are stupid, would that mean you opened your mouth and removed all doubt?

Skyjack

Postby Skyjack » Fri Jul 09, 2004 3:47 pm

I tell you one thing: If Kerry doesn't leave the Ketchup-Lady home he will lose. She is one annoying Ho.

I mean that in the best possible way, of course.

User avatar
Posts: 1774
Joined: Tue Nov 05, 2002 5:17 pm
Location: Land of the Shemales.

Postby JimmyTango » Fri Jul 09, 2004 3:53 pm

Originally posted by Skyjack
I tell you one thing: If Kerry doesn't leave the Ketchup-Lady home he will lose. She is one annoying Ho.


Who, Tootsie?

PreviousNext

Return to The Smokin' Room

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot] and 9 guests