Who would you vote for in the next election?
Fri Aug 01, 2003 9:59 am
[list=1]
[*]George Bush (R-incumbent)
[*]John Kerry (D)
[*]Howard Dean (D)
[*]John Edwards (D)
[*]Richard Gephardt (D)
[/list=1]
[*]George Bush (R-incumbent)
[*]John Kerry (D)
[*]Howard Dean (D)
[*]John Edwards (D)
[*]Richard Gephardt (D)
[/list=1]
Fri Aug 01, 2003 10:04 am
And yes, I do know I'm leaving out some possible contenders. However, those left out either have no organization, no financial backing, or no significant support among voters (sorry, Rev. Sharpton, Mr. Kucinich, and the rest of you).
Oh, and I get to eat the winner, naturally.
Oh, and I get to eat the winner, naturally.
Fri Aug 01, 2003 10:31 am
You forgot the "None of the Above" option...
I am not going to vote...
I am not going to vote...
Fri Aug 01, 2003 11:05 am
Same here I will not vote for any of them.
Fri Aug 01, 2003 4:48 pm
Originally posted by Gusbenz3000
Same here I will not vote for any of them.
Of course you wont.you are not old enough to vote..
Fri Aug 01, 2003 5:44 pm
Im old enough to vote... but never do. I guess I should but i just see it as a waste of time, honestly i dont care who the president is.
Fri Aug 01, 2003 7:06 pm
At this point, I would probably vote Dean, simply because hes the only one to truely step up and challenge Bush and his administration.
That might change though.
I don't know why anyone would want to reelect Bush, he hasn't done anything more than.
a.) involved us in a long and costly (both in money and lives) occupation in Iraq.
b.) Totally ignore the economy, and instead gave huge taxbreaks to the wealthy. Which means little money for the state, which means all the states are reduced to deficit spending.
c.) Cares nothing for the environment. I'm no tree hugger, but deregulating industrial pollution output is not a good thing.
That might change though.
I don't know why anyone would want to reelect Bush, he hasn't done anything more than.
a.) involved us in a long and costly (both in money and lives) occupation in Iraq.
b.) Totally ignore the economy, and instead gave huge taxbreaks to the wealthy. Which means little money for the state, which means all the states are reduced to deficit spending.
c.) Cares nothing for the environment. I'm no tree hugger, but deregulating industrial pollution output is not a good thing.
Fri Aug 01, 2003 9:45 pm
And now a deep, philosophical statement:
There are two kinds of people: those who rule and those who are ruled. If you don't vote, guess which group you're in?
Granted, the choices are pretty bad.
By the way, I didn't include None of the Above because he isn't organized and has no money.
There are two kinds of people: those who rule and those who are ruled. If you don't vote, guess which group you're in?
Granted, the choices are pretty bad.
By the way, I didn't include None of the Above because he isn't organized and has no money.
Sat Aug 02, 2003 8:21 pm
That's strange...I'm poor as hell and still got a "huge tax break for the wealthy".
In fact, my wife and I used them (rebates) for a vacation, not a muffler.
It's apparently time for new material. The old Democrat playbook is stale. I'm surprised there aren't still morons worrying about the world's oil resources being depleted by the late 1990's.
In fact, my wife and I used them (rebates) for a vacation, not a muffler.
It's apparently time for new material. The old Democrat playbook is stale. I'm surprised there aren't still morons worrying about the world's oil resources being depleted by the late 1990's.
Sat Aug 02, 2003 9:16 pm
Originally posted by Jeffro
I am not going to vote...
If you dont vote you cant complain.
Sat Aug 02, 2003 9:19 pm
Originally posted by rust
Of course you wont.you are not old enough to vote..
Your right but if I could vote I would not vote for any of them.
