hoot man

Off topic, but don't go too far overboard - after all, we are watching...heh.
LordShard

hoot man

Postby LordShard » Sat Jan 15, 2005 9:20 pm

Can anyone find the article CERN made about not being able to measure anything smaller than a planck length because the instumentation would iether be so masive it collapses into a black hole or is so large that the speed of light isn't fast enough to traverse it's relays?

User avatar
Posts: 3024
Joined: Mon Jul 26, 2004 11:49 pm
Location: St.Louis, MO

Re: hoot man

Postby Stl Lunatic » Sat Jan 15, 2005 9:29 pm

Originally posted by LordShard
Can anyone find the article CERN made about not being able to measure anything smaller than a planck length because the instumentation would iether be so masive it collapses into a black hole or is so large that the speed of light isn't fast enough to traverse it's relays?
:eek: :rotflmao:

LordShard

Re: Re: hoot man

Postby LordShard » Sat Jan 15, 2005 9:33 pm

Originally posted by Stl Lunatic
:eek: :rotflmao:
:rant: :tard:

User avatar
Posts: 3024
Joined: Mon Jul 26, 2004 11:49 pm
Location: St.Louis, MO

Re: Re: Re: hoot man

Postby Stl Lunatic » Sat Jan 15, 2005 9:47 pm

Originally posted by LordShard
:rant: :tard:
I just thought that to be a funny question to ask...thats all. Sorry if I offended you...:P lol

User avatar
Posts: 2045
Joined: Tue Feb 25, 2003 6:19 pm
Location: Fort Bliss, TX

Re: hoot man

Postby Evan » Sat Jan 15, 2005 9:59 pm

Originally posted by LordShard
Can anyone find the article CERN made about not being able to measure anything smaller than a planck length because the instumentation would iether be so masive it collapses into a black hole or is so large that the speed of light isn't fast enough to traverse it's relays?


English?
Image.

LordShard

Postby LordShard » Sat Jan 15, 2005 10:04 pm

Can anyone find the article CERN made about not being able to measure anything smaller than a Planck length because the instrumentation would either be so massive it collapses into a black hole or is so large that the speed of light isn't fast enough to traverse its relays?

Better?

User avatar
Posts: 6304
Joined: Sat Jan 04, 2003 5:43 am
Location: Quebec, Canada

Postby Chacal » Sat Jan 15, 2005 10:55 pm

It's not CERN, it's CalTech
(Xavier Calmet, Michael Graesser and Stephen Hsu).

You'll probably get a Nobel prize for your innovative use of quantum physics in justifying Spam.
Chacal


[SIZE="1"][color="LightBlue"]Reporter: "Mr Gandhi, what do you think of western civilization?"
Gandhi: "I think it would be a great idea."[/color][/SIZE]

LordShard

Postby LordShard » Sat Jan 15, 2005 10:58 pm

Originally posted by Chacal
It's not CERN, it's CalTech
(Xavier Calmet, Michael Graesser and Stephen Hsu).

You'll probably get a Nobel prize for your innovative use of quantum physics in justifying Spam.
:D

MoJo

Postby MoJo » Sun Jan 16, 2005 4:15 am

Wtf are you talking about? :D

User avatar
Posts: 2840
Joined: Thu Feb 13, 2003 12:54 pm

Postby cavalierlwt » Sun Jan 16, 2005 4:34 am

That's the thing about Shard's spam: it travels at the speed of light. You can either judge it's length, or it's postion in a thread, but never both at the same time. And just the very act of observing (reading) his post changes the outcome, so you can never be sure of what Shard intended in the first place.
Failing to plead
with a throat full of dust
Life falls asleep
in a fetal position.

MoJo

Postby MoJo » Sun Jan 16, 2005 5:35 am

Yeah Totally Correctamundo :D

LordShard

Postby LordShard » Sun Jan 16, 2005 6:25 am

Originally posted by MoJo
Yeah Totally Correctamundo :D
I looked it up on CERN that if you have half a gram of anti-matter it would be equal to the bomb dropped on Hiroshima. =O
That aside, I always liked the willy shaking the bacon.

Return to The Smokin' Room

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 18 guests