Unfairenheit 9/11

by **Jeffro** » Tue Jun 29, 2004 4:18 pm

Originally posted by Face
Thanks! I have finally gotten too lazy to do so much in my house that I bought. I am going to have to stop by and play some BF too!

Sweet!

I'm ready to kick your ass!

by **JimmyTango** » Tue Jun 29, 2004 4:42 pm

Originally posted by Face

It doesn't suprise me that my first post on the forums in months and Tango attacks it - some things never do change.

Nor does it suprise me that your first post back is in a political post, where the posts will get heated, and you 'sling'(as you like to say) accusations without facts like a 'Liberalcrat' would yourself. :roll:

Keep listening to those Bush commercials saying how great it is that he was able to lower the interest rates, that great fact you pointed out that makes him so great may come true one day if you keep wishing it. Kerry will raise the interest rate if 're-elected?' one, he hasn't be elected, 2, he has no power to raise the interest rates. BTW, they already are being raised to offset inflation. :roll:

Let me guess, you will not knock bush for your interest rates going up when you just did Kerry.

I also find it not suprising that you would call a decorated veteran a 'puss' and would not be suprised someone would jump on it nor would you think of it as bad at all. Yeah, good thinking. :roll:

You are right, some things never change, like you thinking your shit doesn't stink.

Oh, and if this is a personal attack to you:

You sit on your fucking couch and can critise a veteran's view on a war he fought in, when your view is 'I am going to sit here on my ass and call you a puss while the rest of America can go over there and kick some ass!!!'

Then you have your own issues to deal with.

by **Colonel Ingus** » Tue Jun 29, 2004 4:47 pm

Keep listening to those Bush commercials saying how great it is that he was able to lower the interest rates, that great fact you pointed out that makes him so great may come true one day if you keep wishing it.

Pot, Kettle, ...Black?

by **Folic_Acid** » Tue Jun 29, 2004 4:56 pm

Originally posted by JimmyTango
Nor does it suprise me that your first post back is in a political post, where the posts will get heated, and you 'sling'(as you like to say) accusations...

<stuff>

What, no response for me?

by **JimmyTango** » Tue Jun 29, 2004 5:11 pm

Why repeat the same thing over and over only to have you bitch I keep posting in about 2 pages? Or have you say things like 'using that curse would shows this and that about you' while you use words not commonly used like ingret, impugn or the other words you pull out of your apparently handy thesaurus to make you look as stuck up as humanly possible. Nah, lets use peremptory instead of stuck up.

by **hightimber** » Tue Jun 29, 2004 6:04 pm

Originally posted by JimmyTango
while you use words not commonly used like ingret, impugn or the other words you pull out of your apparently handy thesaurus

Heaven forbid that someone would have command of the English language nowadays.

Folic, can y'all swap-out some of your wordz, so as they can be ciphered by the leazt commun denomunater?

Can you do that fo' shizzle?

Word!

by **Colonel Ingus** » Tue Jun 29, 2004 6:35 pm

Big wurd hurt head! Grog SMASH!

by **PudriK** » Tue Jun 29, 2004 6:53 pm

Air National Guard in 60s - while not as dangerous as Viet Nam, Bush's unit was active doing counter-bomber intercept patrols during the Cold War. Bush lost a couple squadron-mates to accidents during his time in. Yeah, it was probably a cake duty to get away from going to war, but better than being a draft-dodger.

Who are we to second guess any of these men?

Would YOU have gone to fight in Viet Nam?

Have you signed up to fight in Iraq?

Do you think military service is a necessary prerequisite for being President?

Then don't make an issue of it. I base my decisions on how good a job I think they will do now, not what job they did when they were in their 20s. Character and ability change after three decades.

PS Big Red One = 1st Infantry Division

by **SavageParrot** » Tue Jun 29, 2004 6:58 pm

I love the way you all argue as if Bush actually runs the country, his advisors are far too intelligent to even let him choose his own breakfast cereal.

by **Colonel Ingus** » Tue Jun 29, 2004 7:00 pm

Shut yer piehole and go back to awaiting yer next King, "Wingnut".

:lol:

by **JimmyTango** » Tue Jun 29, 2004 7:52 pm

Originally posted by PudriK
Who are we to second guess any of these men?

We are the citizens that are directly effected by their actions. We have the right in this country to question them, in case you never heard.

Originally posted by PudriK

Would YOU have gone to fight in Viet Nam?

Depends on which phase. The early phase, being fought properly, or the later phase, a politician-run blood bath. people forget that when Vietnam first broke out it had a very large approval rate, then dropped over time as the running of it got wrose and worse.

Originally posted by PudriK

Have you signed up to fight in Iraq?

Due to injuries I would not even be allowed, they would send me right out the door the second they saw the metal in my shoulder. Besides that, why woudl I if I feel that the resonse we are over there are made up? I know, the Bush White House said 'no, they are not, see, photos of a building, never mind these buildings have been checked by inspectors and found to be nothing, just look at them.'

Originally posted by PudriK

Do you think military service is a necessary prerequisite for being President?

Hell no. But when it comes to calling a decorated vet a 'puss' and a man who hid in the Texas National Guard a good war leader it does come into play.

Originally posted by PudriK

Then don't make an issue of it. I base my decisions on how good a job I think they will do now, not what job they did when they were in their 20s. Character and ability change after three decades.

You know it is against the law for the President to begin funding a war without concent, correct? Bush used money from the war against terror to fund the start up on the War in Iraq. That is who is leading this country now, and it is just one instance of huge question marks on this mans term. Handing away contracts to companies that did not have to bid on them, that just happen to be the company Vice President ran? Um, hello? Just another instance of 'WTF is going on in DC?'

Originally posted by PudriK

PS Big Red One = 1st Infantry Division

A storied division that has given a lot for this country. My friend that is currently attached to them personally handcuffed one of Saddam's Lieutenant a few weeks ago. It was a boost for him, he was getting tired of wild dogs chasing him and his squad through the streets while on patrol, kids bothering his squad while on patrol and nightly mortar attacks on his FOB without being able to catch the ones doing it.

by **Face** » Tue Jun 29, 2004 9:20 pm

Originally posted by JimmyTango
Depends on which phase. The early phase, being fought properly, or the later phase, a politician-run blood bath.

So, you mean you would have gone in the early phase? The phase where Ho Chi Mihn was pleading with the French for Vietnamese freedom and an adoption of Western/European ways? You would have signed on to prevent the Vietnam people from having their own country back? Excuse me Sir, but my god are you misinformed. Do some research into the Vietnamese people and Mihn during WWII - the way Mihn and his people sided with the Allies against the Japanese, and how England, Roosevelt, and the other European powers told him to basically go fly a kite and bow down to French rule.

Originally posted by JimmyTango
But when it comes to calling a decorated vet a 'puss' ...

So, freedom of speech is only okay if I speak in your favor? Do you think that every war veteran is a saint and a hero? Kerry's 3 months in combat in Nam got him 3 Purple Hearts, but guys who lost legs and arms didn't? Then he disgraces all true soldiers by throwing them over the Whitehouse fence? This clown had the gears in action long, long ago about how to manipulate the public and become a politician.

Originally posted by JimmyTango
You know it is against the law for the President to begin funding a war without concent, correct?

If you could even tell me the source of this law you speak of I would be surprised. Oh, and your investigation of the funding of the war, too, since you know so much. Since when did Congress appoint you to investigate the finances of the Iraqi war?

by **PudriK** » Tue Jun 29, 2004 9:25 pm

Originally posted by JimmyTango
We are the citizens that are directly effected by their actions. We have the right in this country to question them, in case you never heard.

Yeah, I got the memo. I was refering to questioning their past actions. I fully support questioning the job they do in their elected roles. After all, they work for us. I don't however, think it is our place to decide whether they were brave or not to go to a war that many in the US felt was unjust and a waste - like you do about the Iraq war now. Plus, like I said, people change after 30 years.

Due to injuries I would not even be allowed, they would send me right out the door the second they saw the metal in my shoulder. Besides that, why woudl I if I feel that the resonse we are over there are made up? I know, the Bush White House said 'no, they are not, see, photos of a building, never mind these buildings have been checked by inspectors and found to be nothing, just look at them.'

Exactly... so can you fault Bush or Clinton for not wanting to go to Viet Nam?

Hell no. But when it comes to calling a decorated vet a 'puss' and a man who hid in the Texas National Guard a good war leader it does come into play.

Well, it is a juvenile term, but the point being made is that while Bush has taken a firm stand on his convictions despite the criticism of his political opponents--which many would call leadership--Kerry has been plagued with accusations of being wishy-washy and not strong on defense. I wouldn't call that being a "puss," but I do doubt his ability to lead. (Politically speaking, of course, not withstanding his small-unit leadership, which is a different animal.)

You know it is against the law for the President to begin funding a war without concent, correct? Bush used money from the war against terror to fund the start up on the War in Iraq. That is who is leading this country now, and it is just one instance of huge question marks on this mans term. Handing away contracts to companies that did not have to bid on them, that just happen to be the company Vice President ran? Um, hello? Just another instance of 'WTF is going on in DC?'

Good point, however, Congress does control appropriations and could yank it away if it was in their political interest. The fact that war was not "declared" is only a matter of semantics. Functionally, Congress approved Bush's actions through a resolution and controls the purse strings that fund the war effort. Enough of the public still supports the war, and Congress reflects this.

A storied division that has given a lot for this country. My friend that is currently attached to them personally handcuffed one of Saddam's Lieutenant a few weeks ago. It was a boost for him, he was getting tired of wild dogs chasing him and his squad through the streets while on patrol, kids bothering his squad while on patrol and nightly mortar attacks on his FOB without being able to catch the ones doing it.

I don't envy their job over there. Being an occupation force is a hell of a lot harder than a straight up fight. A :beer:

to his safe return.

by **Colonel Ingus** » Tue Jun 29, 2004 9:33 pm

I'm having a hard time reconciling this "Bush is a War dodger, His daddy got him a cushy Guard position" with 8 years of defending draft dodging and "I didn't inhale".

How about some of those other slackers that were President that never served. Useless guys like FDR or Abraham Lincoln. Now there were a couple of military slackers that commanded our nations armed forces during a time of conflict! Lets bash them too!

It wasn't an issue when Clinton was president (to me) and it isn't an issue with George either (again to me, but then again I am not out for "my party").

Hell the last President we had that actually was in the military during a war and fought was George Sr. To most of you guys arguing you were just teenagers then. Name me the last president prior to him that served during a war? I will bet you have a hard time doing it.

by **Folic_Acid** » Tue Jun 29, 2004 10:19 pm

Originally posted by JimmyTango
You know it is against the law for the President to begin funding a war without concent, correct? Bush used money from the war against terror to fund the start up on the War in Iraq. That is who is leading this country now, and it is just one instance of huge question marks on this mans term. Handing away contracts to companies that did not have to bid on them, that just happen to be the company Vice President ran? Um, hello? Just another instance of 'WTF is going on in DC?'

I refer you to H J Res 114 of the 107th Congress, (P.L. 107-243), found here. Specifically, the part which reads:

SEC. 3. AUTHORIZATION FOR USE OF UNITED STATES ARMED FORCES.

(a) Authorization.--The President is authorized to use the Armed Forces of the United States as he determines to be necessary and appropriate in order to--
(1) defend the national security of the United States against the continuing threat posed by Iraq; and
(2) enforce all relevant United Nations Security Council resolutions regarding Iraq.

Originally posted by JimmyTango
Hell no. But when it comes to calling a decorated vet a 'puss' and a man who hid in the Texas National Guard a good war leader it does come into play.

You have yet to explain your insult to the Guard by implying that one is "hiding" from something by joining the National Guard instead of the active duty Air Force. Why is being in the National Guard a bad thing? Why do you keep criticizing Bush for joining? Why do you keep throwing the tired accusations of the left around? Surely you have some better reason to dislike Bush than this...?

Originally posted by JimmyTango
Besides that, why woudl I if I feel that the resonse we are over there are made up? I know, the Bush White House said 'no, they are not, see, photos of a building, never mind these buildings have been checked by inspectors and found to be nothing, just look at them.'

Perhaps one might join the military because he loves this country, as I do. Perhaps one would join the military because he wants other people of the world, much less fortunate than himself, to be able to experience something that even resembles the freedoms we enjoy. Perhaps one is an idealist, like me, and gets angry at the hatred directed at the things like peace and freedom our nation and our allies stand for, and wants to be able to defend their home, family, and friends from those people. Or perhaps one is just too selfish and cynical to believe any of that, and would rather criticize though who have a larger vision for the world. That's one of the beauties of freedom - anyone has the right to join or not, to love the country or not, to believe in peace and freedom or not.

Unfairenheit 9/11

Who is online