John Edwards for VP?

by **LeVar Burton** » Tue Jul 06, 2004 9:15 pm

I wasn't bashing Jimmy, just pointing out that he might very well have a fabrication in his sig.

I won't lie about it... I'm a Bush supporter. I ignored his sig even thought I found that part to be a little fishy, but when he cites it as a reason that Bush is "dumb," I felt the need to look it up. After sifting through a couple pages of leftist pages, I came across the Washington Post.

Don't get me wrong, some of the right-wing posters on this forum piss me off just as much as Jimmy if not more just because they make us look bad.

by **COL.BUKKAKE** » Tue Jul 06, 2004 9:17 pm

Originally posted by JimmyTango
he is a court jester, jumping aroudn making an ass of himself AND this country.

Bush is really like to my signature: a stupid redneck hick.

what is in there is that idiot we have for a President. You can love him all you like, I do nto care, he is ruining this country, he has pissed and shit all over our most sacred ideals, and he has made our country look stupid to the rest of the world.

Do you consider getting head in the Oval Office and spewing all over some fat whore's dress.......more beffiting actions of the leader of the free world.

Maybe, just maybe, if the chick was hot and lets say did it in the Lincoln Bedroom I might cut him some slack.

by **deathBOB** » Tue Jul 06, 2004 9:27 pm

deathBOB for VP
deathBOB for VP
deathBOB for VP
deathBOB for VP
deathBOB for VP

by **Pierce** » Tue Jul 06, 2004 9:33 pm

jk:beer:

by **Colonel Ingus** » Tue Jul 06, 2004 10:15 pm

This whole Neocon, liberalcrat, etc name calling is the biggest load of sh*t to come down the pipe, seriously. Most people are only slightly left or right of center, very slightly. Most Republicans aren't rich racist, homophobic people, most democrats aren't anti-American, communist sympathizer pacifists. Way on the left and right fringe, those people exist, and they tend to make a lot more noise than the other 99% (normal) population. Fair enough?

But the screwed up thing is when we perceive of 'them' to be the radical kind when they aren't. To counter our perception of them, we become a ridiculous cartoon image temporarily. Soon enough, Jimmy Tango has a bunch a rhetoric in his sig, and Face is calling him a liberalcrat. Something tells me Jimmy Tango does NOT burn US flags and worship Lenin, and Face probably isn't a nazi militant ready to kill a commie for mommy!
So, why the hell are we playing these cartoon roles, providing each other with a political boogeyman?
It's like watching a cat hiss and bristle at it's reflection in a mirror.

WOW! just wow.

well said

by **Colonel Ingus** » Tue Jul 06, 2004 11:53 pm

Here's a post I got from an Iraqi 'blog. I post it in the spirit of what cavalier was saying.

How is life in Iraq? Depends on your point of view. A bunch of us were talking the other night; one friend, very angry, said: "Did you see what happened today in Antar Square? The Americans came, blocked the street and attacked the toy store. They were smashing kid's bicycles!" Another friend, listening carefully, asked: "Was there a big loading truck with them?" Yes, came the reply. The second friend then told his version: it turned out he'd been at the store buying a bike for his son. "I was in the middle of tough bargaining with the shopkeeper when two Humvees and a truck stopped out front. One of the Humvees waved all the cars to pass. Soldiers from the second Humvee said they wanted to buy some bicycles. It didn't take a long time, as they didn't bargain, and they bought a huge number of bicycles and filled the truck with them and left." Whom to believe? Here are two good friends and both were on the scene. As for me, it didn't take a lot of effort to figure out who was closer to the truth. Those bikes have probably been delivered to a local school. – Mohammed

The most important part of this post? Well, here you see too diametrically oppossed and probably very politically motivated points of view.

Whom to believe? Here are two good friends and both were on the scene.

Notice how their recollection of the events and their views on it completely differed? But these guys were all good friends hanging out together discussing the news of the day.

Funny isn't it? you can almost see that happening in places other than Iraq. Hell it could happen here some day!

by **JimmyTango** » Wed Jul 07, 2004 7:36 am

Originally posted by LeVar Burton
I wasn't bashing Jimmy, just pointing out that he might very well have a fabrication in his sig.

That was a great article you posted, thank you. it woke me up. The White House denies it, who would have thought?

by **JimmyTango** » Wed Jul 07, 2004 7:38 am

Originally posted by COL.BUKKAKE
Do you consider getting head in the Oval Office and spewing all over some fat whore's dress.......more beffiting actions of the leader of the free world.

Maybe, just maybe, if the chick was hot and lets say did it in the Lincoln Bedroom I might cut him some slack.

Here is the problem: you automaticly think that if I am displeased with Bush, or I am not a Republican, I am a Clinton supporter, a Kerry supporter(like int he other thread) and a democrat.

Here is a little secret I will let you into: the United States of America is not a two party system.

I will say that the problem during Clonton's administration is that $80 million dollars was spent to dig up as mnuch dirt on him as possible so that they could possibly nail him on the stand. To me that is the biggest tragedy. All of us have had indiscretions in our life time, I can think of only one where millions of tax payers money was spent digging up every little indiscretion with the sole purpose of nailing someone under oath.

by **Colonel Ingus** » Wed Jul 07, 2004 11:11 am

Correct me if I am wrong here Jimmy but that 80 million wasn't just spent trying to point out Bill lied under oath. A significant pportion was spent on the Whitewater investigation.

IMO that needed to be spent just like the investigations into the S&L scandals during the 80's. And much like the S&L scams of the 80's no one was found guilty and the rich got richer illegally without getting into trouble.

Probably just as much as there needs to be an investigation into the open ended contract that was awarded Haliburton without open bidding on the contract Now there is something you can point out that the Bush Administration did that was stupid that can be proved.

by **COL.BUKKAKE** » Wed Jul 07, 2004 12:02 pm

Originally posted by JimmyTango

Here is a little secret I will let you into: the United States of America is not a two party system.

It's not? Who else would you vote for? The way it is today, which truly is a shame, there are only 2 choices , anything else would be a wasted vote.

But in your case Jimmy, please vote for Nader or Peter Pan or Al Sharpton.........and I'll be happy.

*notice Peter Pan is before Sharpton, I just think Pan is a more suitable fictitious character.

by **Mr. Slayer** » Wed Jul 07, 2004 12:08 pm

Originally posted by deathBOB
deathBOB for VP
deathBOB for VP
deathBOB for VP
deathBOB for VP
deathBOB for VP

Do you ever stop?

by **hightimber** » Thu Jul 08, 2004 10:01 am

Originally posted by JimmyTango
Hey, a moron .... was elected President.

Is this your way of telling us you have presidential aspirations in 2008?

by **Buliwyf** » Thu Jul 08, 2004 10:05 am

by **Colonel Ingus** » Thu Jul 08, 2004 10:43 am

Here is the problem: you automaticly think that if I am displeased with Bush, or I am not a Republican, I am a Clinton supporter, a Kerry supporter(like int he other thread) and a democrat.

Walks like a duck, Quacks like a duck, What do you guys think it is...?

I have got to admit thats a nice find there Buliwyf! Nice!

by **JimmyTango** » Thu Jul 08, 2004 11:05 am

So not liking Bush and not being a Republican means I am a Democrat?

Ingus, in another thread you claim to not be a Republican, you are in the middle and support Bush. i accept that, fine(though disbelieve it with your rants on 'liberals are the cause this and liberals are the cause that,' I only rip on Bush, not the party).

So why is it not allowed to be the opposite?

John Edwards for VP?

Who is online