MPAA gets major win in court

Off topic, but don't go too far overboard - after all, we are watching...heh.
User avatar
Posts: 2276
Joined: Sat Feb 28, 2004 2:37 pm

Postby King » Mon Feb 14, 2005 12:39 am

As far as music goes, when i used to download a lot of music, it was always live stuff recorded at concerts. Not the best quality but i'm a big fan of concerts and live shows that its worth it. Some of the jam bands like Phish and MOE. embrace it and thus are heralded as great bands because they understand the fans are the ones that are important, not the record label.

Bands like Rage Against The Machine used their affiliation with their label to spread their message of tollerance and understanding and also preaching about social injustices and ways to combat it. A true quality band with the right ideals before they split to form audioslave and whatever zack is doing.

Manufactered artists such as the Ashlee Simpsons deserve to be pirated because they have no talent, are supported by record labels that wouldnt know real music even if they went to a Prince show, and are only concerned about the money a name can bring in instead of the quality of the music.

The internet is a blessing and a curse for both Movies and Music companies. Music seems to have adapted and embraced it Movies on the other hand have been sucked into that "NAPSTER VACCUM" that was created years ago when the artists themselves took on file sharing companies.

I think at one point or another everyone here has made some good points for both sides. No need to go flaming about it. Keep it a friendly debate Gents.:)
"Whats the Situation?" "Two blokes and a fuckload of cutlery!"

Be my Cronie! http://www.centsports.com/?opcode=61909

User avatar
Posts: 2709
Joined: Thu Mar 13, 2003 4:11 pm
Location: St. Louis

Postby Jeffro » Mon Feb 14, 2005 1:38 am

I download underground/abstract music you couldn't find in stores (Good luck finding Ravi Shankar's Electronic Indian mix at best buy :freak:. I don't just download music, either. I buy it. I've bought so many cd's that it's hard to count (just recently bought Crystal Method, Commadores, Kool and the Gang, Brick, etc...). I think a good balance between buying and downloading is best, BECAUSE:

A.) If you buy too many cd's (most are at 10-20 bucks a pop), you'll probably not have enough money for food/gas (if you're a college smacker like me).

B.) If you download 1000's of songs a night AND/OR sell them on the blackmarket, you deserve to be put in jail.


Those are my personal opinions, take it or leave it.

:)
Image http://www.purevolume.com/vagabondImage


2.4 Ghz, 4x256 RDRAM PC1066,
Radeon 9700 Non-Pro, 4.6
Catalysts, SB audigy 2, DSL

User avatar
Posts: 10599
Joined: Wed Mar 19, 2003 5:42 pm
Location: Cheltenham, England

Re: Re: MPAA gets major win in court

Postby SavageParrot » Mon Feb 14, 2005 2:31 am

Originally posted by Rand0m
i dont have a problem with the movie industry.


Watch Gigli and that will soon change :D

As for the new formats thing, nobody forced you to buy the new format. VHS players, record players and tape decks are all still readily available to play your olf formats. If you didn't think it was better you didn't have to upgrade.

As for a conspiracy to come up with new formats to make old ones obsolete you are absolutely right. They are always looking for new ways to sell old shit, on the plus side as many of their attempts fail as succeed (mini discs and video cds to name but a few ;))

Off topic I have to say it was nice to see a thread that reminded me why the political threads got shut down all that time ago. Some people can't help themselves; they just gotta flame...
Image
TT clan forums

You knows I still wuvs ya rtcw:beer: ;)

User avatar
Posts: 2840
Joined: Thu Feb 13, 2003 12:54 pm

Postby cavalierlwt » Mon Feb 14, 2005 7:16 am

Originally posted by -HaVoC-
I'll tell you what Jimmy. You get them to stop releasing it every few years in a different format requiring a different player and I'll pay for the rights to watch or listen. I repeat, pay for the right once.

Boy I can't wait for HDVD to make my collection yet again obsolete. I am tired of paying for the same material over and over again in a different format. I have some family in the movie industry they couldn't agree with me more.

Gluttony is ugly even with great effects and marketing campaigns.


Right from today's headlines, check out this article:
http://tinyurl.com/5ou6s

User avatar
Posts: 2386
Joined: Thu Jul 10, 2003 9:11 pm
Location: Massachusetts

Re: Re: Re: MPAA gets major win in court

Postby Rand0m » Mon Feb 14, 2005 7:37 am

Originally posted by SavageParrot
Watch Gigli and that will soon change :D


DOWN WITH THE MOVIE INDUSTRY!!!!!!!!!!

User avatar
Posts: 1774
Joined: Tue Nov 05, 2002 5:17 pm
Location: Land of the Shemales.

Postby JimmyTango » Mon Feb 14, 2005 8:54 am

Originally posted by -HaVoC-
I'm not getting something new and improved. I'm buying another copy of Dark Side of the Moon when I've already bought the thing 3 damn times. Don't take this as something personal. As consumers we've already purchased the material. It's nothing new.


Then you have no idea what you are talking about. Do you think it is free for the company to remaster and album? Look at the SACD version of DSOTM, completely redone by the original sound engineer. Remixed into 5.1 SACD, or redone into 24 bit(redbook CD is 16 bit) 2 channel. It is so expensive to do a hybred SACD, that Blue Note will no longer be releasing any more SACDs. Blue Note happens to do some very big bands/artists, like Van Morrison and Norah Jones, yet they can not afford to convert to the new medium. This again is something you are certain does not cost anything to produce, it is simply another copy.

The problem is that you have no idea about the industry. You think it is the same exact version, just recorded on a different medium. You are wrong, and if you took the time to investigate it you would know.

Originally posted by -HaVoC-

In America? Who'da thunk it. Hell not even America, the greeds global.


This is your little reply to me saying that the record/movie industry is not hedging the way for the new mediums. There are numerous companies competing for the next generation medium. The record/movie industy will look at the different mediums and of course choose the ones that are the most viable(last generation, DVD and DIVx competed in the open market, DVD won). Compact Discs are by far the most viable, and we will be locked into them(for movies) for much longer than music.

If you took the time to investigate instead of thinking up conspiracy theories, you would know this. This is capitalism. A new generation of technology comes out, industries look into which is the most viable and go with it. Many times there are numerous new versions of the same technology(DVD and Divx, HDDVD and Bluray), different companies(including record and movie) will back different formats and then they go to war in the open market.

This is capitalism at it's best.

Originally posted by -HaVoC-
Look man Take your guard down for a moment.


This coming from the man that is paranoid that the movie and record industry is out to get you to buy the same thing over and over, so they are funding the advancement of technology.

Turn off the X-Files marathon for an hour or two, remove the tin foil hat you made and go outside.

Originally posted by -HaVoC-

It is my firm belief that the corporations are driving the technology out of a need to continually present their product to you over and over again for their profit and at your cost.


Your 'firm belief' is based on what? Not a single fact.

User avatar
Posts: 1774
Joined: Tue Nov 05, 2002 5:17 pm
Location: Land of the Shemales.

Postby JimmyTango » Mon Feb 14, 2005 9:00 am

Originally posted by cavalierlwt
Right from today's headlines, check out this article:
http://tinyurl.com/5ou6s


Actually, Yahoo just got around to adding that. It is about 3 days old. It also backs me up, as they are talkign about the advancements of technology, and where we are going in the furutre with them.

This is part of that whole 'set top box' everyone is gunning for. A media center in your home that does everything, watchign TV, surfing the web, a place to purchase media. First will be music converting to this method, then movies. Music first because of extremely smaller file size.

We just have to wait for technology to advance itself.

User avatar
Posts: 38
Joined: Thu Aug 26, 2004 3:44 pm
Location: Ohio

Postby cowboy004 » Mon Feb 14, 2005 11:04 am

WAY TO GO JIMMY

User avatar
Posts: 1774
Joined: Tue Nov 05, 2002 5:17 pm
Location: Land of the Shemales.

Postby JimmyTango » Mon Feb 14, 2005 11:58 am

Originally posted by cowboy004
WAY TO GO JIMMY


How many times do I need to fire you?

User avatar
Posts: 354
Joined: Sun Dec 15, 2002 8:34 am
Location: Minneapolis, MN

Postby Sayntfuu » Mon Feb 14, 2005 12:22 pm

Actually it isn't legal to copy music off the radio either.

We were talking about movies though so I will ty and keep my comments on that topic.

If you downlaod a movie you can face fines in the millions and 12 months in jail.

Shoplift said movie from somewhere and the max fine is $100,000 and 6 months in jail. First offense being much less actually.

That said it is still illegal no matter what the justification. I have a friend that is a big pirate and he thinks he can get away with it if he is ever busted, I laugh. The legal fees to defend yourself alone will crush most people.

The real problem in my eyes is that even if the act of stealing copywritten material does not affect sales in any way they will raise their unit prices somewhat to make up for the lost sales. So those of us who download only from a garageband.com are paying more so those that do steal can do so.

I have slipped into talking about music there because there is not independant film movement out there that could release movies on a garagemovie.com. So really there is no legal way to watch a film you DL.

fuu

User avatar
Posts: 1931
Joined: Sun Dec 21, 2003 1:05 am
Location: Cape Cod, Mass

Postby SkiloDog2000 » Mon Feb 14, 2005 1:07 pm

94.1 out of rhode island is a good station
Image
Image

Posts: 1469
Joined: Sun Dec 29, 2002 2:17 am
Location: North of Boston

Postby -HaVoC- » Mon Feb 14, 2005 4:30 pm

I could not disagree with you more Jimmy. Also I find your demeanor anything but open and intelligent.

Then you have no idea what you are talking about.


I mean seriously who would want to discuss anything with you? There is no discussion. I would discuss the difference between remastered works and simple releases of an unchanged work but why? You'll simply say...
Then you have no idea what you are talking about.
and then begin to attempt to explain to me how your perspective speaks and wreaks of the truth.

Somewhere in there is an opinion that could be listened to if it was presented in a non threatening open minded way. At this point I have no want or need for your opinion. I barely read the reply because because it offered nothing constructive.

HaVoC out...
-

"Now, if things look bad, and it looks like your not going to make it, then you've got to get mean, I mean plum mad dog mean, 'cause if you lose your head and give up then you neither live nor win, and that's just the way it is."

- The Outlaw Josey Wales -

put me on the team that Harry aint on....I sure miss shooting him and if im on the same team as HaVoC...OMFG we will stomp a mudhole in you and walk it dry.

- YaDad -

Image

User avatar
Posts: 1774
Joined: Tue Nov 05, 2002 5:17 pm
Location: Land of the Shemales.

Postby JimmyTango » Mon Feb 14, 2005 4:47 pm

Originally posted by -HaVoC-
I could not disagree with you more Jimmy.

What does this matter? Your stance is based on opinion(you even admit it).

Your opinion does not defeat fact.

Originally posted by -HaVoC-
Also I find your demeanor anything but open and intelligent.


Yes, your demeanor is just peachy, too, huh?

BTW, is it intelligent to argue your opinion against facts? Just wondering how you factor in intelligence. To me, anyone who argues their opinion over facts has little to no intelligence at all.

Jimmy out.........:roll:

Posts: 1469
Joined: Sun Dec 29, 2002 2:17 am
Location: North of Boston

Postby -HaVoC- » Mon Feb 14, 2005 5:02 pm

Your opinion does not defeat fact.


I had a good friend once that also thought most of what he spoke was fact, and that I was wrong if I could not adhere to his way of thought.

It's all perspective and opinion. You haven't come to this understanding yet in life? I can form my own opinion and it will differ from yours.

The problem is that it's merely an argument with you and it's all your looking for. Yes they are opinions and we as a people can have our own and it can differ from yours. I have no need for flames or an argument with you.

Nothing constructive has or will come from this thread.
-

"Now, if things look bad, and it looks like your not going to make it, then you've got to get mean, I mean plum mad dog mean, 'cause if you lose your head and give up then you neither live nor win, and that's just the way it is."

- The Outlaw Josey Wales -

put me on the team that Harry aint on....I sure miss shooting him and if im on the same team as HaVoC...OMFG we will stomp a mudhole in you and walk it dry.

- YaDad -

Image

User avatar
Posts: 417
Joined: Thu Dec 02, 2004 10:54 pm
Location: Ventura,CA

Postby EZC » Mon Feb 14, 2005 5:07 pm

touch gloves! go to your corners and come out fighting!! ding ding
"They told me it was healthy to collect things, so I decided to collect pictures of dead presidents." - Willie Sutton, Bank Robber
Image Made by Spirit of Me
Image

PreviousNext

Return to The Smokin' Room

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 17 guests