Worst thread-killers...

Off topic, but don't go too far overboard - after all, we are watching...heh.
Rule of Wrist

Worst thread-killers...

Postby Rule of Wrist » Thu Apr 03, 2003 2:11 pm

These are the type of people that when they post it makes no sense, aren't funny, don't have a firm grasp of english, and generally make the reader of the post dumber while they mutter to themselves incoherently and twitch spasmodically....

:freak:

:freak:

:freak:

:freak:

:flame:

I nominate Hitpoint, beast and bloodbudda for starters.

These people must be stopped! Let's start a petition....

:ar15:

Edogg

Postby Edogg » Thu Apr 03, 2003 2:35 pm

i vote hitpoint and beast

#1HiTPoInT

Postby #1HiTPoInT » Thu Apr 03, 2003 2:54 pm

I've got a great grasp of English, and they are funny.

(Maybe the utter falseness of this post makes it funny.)

[RD]{gen}Beast

Postby [RD]{gen}Beast » Thu Apr 03, 2003 2:56 pm

ok...
i will stop with my short and much posting lol
i will make up somethin so it will be much longer posts:)

User avatar
Posts: 6304
Joined: Sat Jan 04, 2003 5:43 am
Location: Quebec, Canada

Postby Chacal » Thu Apr 03, 2003 3:06 pm

It depends if they follow the rules or not. If they clearly don't, it's the forum admins job to stop them. Hitpoint comes to mind.

If they do, then it becomes a question of personal judgment, you can decide they're idiots, or annoying, or boring, and put them on your ignore list. Beast and BloodBudda are good example, as well as many others. I use this function extensively.

Blocking them based on content, not form, would be censorship. I'm against any form of censorship, mainly because censorship always begins with seemingly reasonable and justifiable reasons, and then always becomes perverted by individuals pursuing their own agenda. The various recent attempts at controlling the Internet are a perfect example.

I'm beginning to sound like BloodBudda, so I'll stop right here... don't want to appear on your list. :)

#1HiTPoInT

Postby #1HiTPoInT » Thu Apr 03, 2003 3:06 pm

Thank God. Finally some willingful change around here! (Maybe I should do that, too!)

Rule of Wrist

Postby Rule of Wrist » Thu Apr 03, 2003 3:20 pm

You grasp english and yet you use a word like willingful?

:tard: :tard: :tard: :tard:

Rule of Wrist

Postby Rule of Wrist » Thu Apr 03, 2003 3:24 pm

I agree with your views of censorship chacal.

I am just trying to give a little awareness to the offending parties of what they are doing. Probably a wasted effort on my part...

:roll:

User avatar
Posts: 447
Joined: Sun Nov 03, 2002 3:27 pm
Location: Baton Rouge, USA

Postby bayotanzk » Thu Apr 03, 2003 3:34 pm

No censorship. Freedom of speach and access to all forms of communication are rights our forefathers fought and have died for, and our soldiers today fight for many of the same rights. National security of the US and any other country that deems extra steps are necessary are fine with me, not censorship. Big brother may watch, but not play.
486 dx 50 -32 megs ram -8 meg vid card -120 meg HD -14"vga monitor, dos 5.0

[RD]{gen}Beast

Postby [RD]{gen}Beast » Thu Apr 03, 2003 3:36 pm

lol all hate me i aint a bad guy am i:(
damn im gonna stop posting here because no one loves me:(
im very sad now LOL:(
not funny:(
i really will stop!!!!!!!!!!!! i promise!!!!!!!!!!

[A.S.H.]Aquaman

Postby [A.S.H.]Aquaman » Thu Apr 03, 2003 6:09 pm

Oh my! Beast is sad. :(

El Cid

Postby El Cid » Thu Apr 03, 2003 11:00 pm

Originally posted by [RD]{gen}Beast
lol all hate me i aint a bad guy am i:(
damn im gonna stop posting here because no one loves me:(
im very sad now LOL:(
not funny:(
i really will stop!!!!!!!!!!!! i promise!!!!!!!!!!


Alright thats good. You sound reformed :D NO hardfeelings, its just a forum.

#1HiTPoInT

Postby #1HiTPoInT » Thu Apr 03, 2003 11:23 pm

Originally posted by bayotanzk
No censorship. Freedom of speach and access to all forms of communication are rights our forefathers fought and have died for, and our soldiers today fight for many of the same rights. National security of the US and any other country that deems extra steps are necessary are fine with me, not censorship. Big brother may watch, but not play.


"Give me Liberty, or give me death!"

Posts: 96
Joined: Sat Oct 26, 2002 4:11 pm
Location: Waukesha, WI

Postby Ruci » Fri Apr 04, 2003 1:02 am

Originally posted by bayotanzk
No censorship. Freedom of speach and access to all forms of communication are rights our forefathers fought and have died for, and our soldiers today fight for many of the same rights. National security of the US and any other country that deems extra steps are necessary are fine with me, not censorship. Big brother may watch, but not play.


No big brother may NOT watch.

User avatar
Posts: 6304
Joined: Sat Jan 04, 2003 5:43 am
Location: Quebec, Canada

Postby Chacal » Fri Apr 04, 2003 2:00 am

National security, war on terrorism, war on drugs, fight against mafia, fight against kiddie porn, fight against commies, it's all the same: good sounding reasons for erosion of privacy by giving the FBI more Big Brother rights. There are NO acceptable exceptions.

But I'm swaying off-topic.
Chacal


[SIZE="1"][color="LightBlue"]Reporter: "Mr Gandhi, what do you think of western civilization?"
Gandhi: "I think it would be a great idea."[/color][/SIZE]

Next

Return to The Smokin' Room

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 12 guests