What is the better OS?
20 posts
• Page 1 of 2 • 1, 2
- Wairudo Enjin
-
- Posts: 1294
- Joined: Sat Nov 30, 2002 5:55 am
- Location: Atlanta, Ga
I run Windows XP, NT, 98, 95, Linux, and OS/400 (on the AS/400).
OS/400 is the most solid of any of the above mentioned with Linux being the second most stable.

OS/400 is the most solid of any of the above mentioned with Linux being the second most stable.
- Gusbenz3000
I run OS X, OS 9.2...I run 9.2 to play games, OS X eats up alot of RAM and you need RAM for a game to run...When I get 512MB of RAM then I may be able to run Wolf under OS X(thats the only game that does not run in OS X that I have.) Os 9.2 is not all that bad..but OS X is much better with stability...I have never had one crush in OS X. Now don't you just want to run out there and buy a Mac? 

- Rule of Wrist
Inclined to agree with Wairudo as well... but out of 98, 2K and XP... I like 2K.
It doesn't have all of the big-brother-may-I stuff in it that XP does and when you hit cntrl+ALT+DLT, it comes out of ANYTHING to bring up the task manager... XP will not...
Macs? Bah, when they have a machine with more than a 2 ghz CPU for less than $1000 dollars, then I might pay attention... but probably not...
It doesn't have all of the big-brother-may-I stuff in it that XP does and when you hit cntrl+ALT+DLT, it comes out of ANYTHING to bring up the task manager... XP will not...
Macs? Bah, when they have a machine with more than a 2 ghz CPU for less than $1000 dollars, then I might pay attention... but probably not...
20 posts
• Page 1 of 2 • 1, 2
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 4 guests