signatures

by **yaDad** » Fri Oct 17, 2003 10:50 am

is my signature to large/cause lag/problems/bitch rant and rave....?

i dont know of any set limits on signature size and since it is not stored on ECGN servers but locally...cant really see why there would be a limit on size.

someone edumacate me just a little on yer opinions regarding signatures.

by **Rule of Wrist** » Fri Oct 17, 2003 11:28 am

Works fine for me, no problems.

I have medium end machines at home and at work, and it doesn't bog either of them...

Keep the Iwo Jima flag raising. The battle in american history with the most Congressional Medal of Honor winners...

by **Bagginses** » Fri Oct 17, 2003 11:34 am

They seem to be fine on my computer, and that's saying alot. I should probably think of something creative to put in my signature, it's kind of barren down there...

-Bagginses

by **Bullhead** » Fri Oct 17, 2003 11:50 am

No issues for me, sounds like someone else's PC has other issues

by **Edogg** » Fri Oct 17, 2003 11:52 am

well on my gaming machine, there are no problems at all. But when im on my laptop, it lags whenever I try to scroll.

by **yaDad** » Fri Oct 17, 2003 12:05 pm

Originally posted by Rule of Wrist
Works fine for me, no problems.

I have medium end machines at home and at work, and it doesn't bog either of them...

Keep the Iwo Jima flag raising. The battle in american history with the most Congressional Medal of Honor winners...

just so happens that my birthday falls on the day of the flag raising.....feb 23

by **JimmyTango** » Fri Oct 17, 2003 1:03 pm

Still lags my comp at work.

by **Tommy Boy** » Fri Oct 17, 2003 1:25 pm

fine for me at work and at home...i think that the flag raising is enough though...no need for both?

by **Buliwyf** » Fri Oct 17, 2003 3:14 pm

Originally posted by Yadad
just so happens that my birthday falls on the day of the flag raising.....feb 23

hey, my birthday is feb 24

by **Chacal** » Fri Oct 17, 2003 4:29 pm

It does lag a little bit for me.

The problem I see with signatures though is they slow the server for everyone. I go to the forums mainly to see messages and replies, and sometime on a busy thread it takes a long time to load 15 messages just because of graphical signatures (or graphic ones

).

Also, there's a web usability issue (I used to do work in that field). Most of the time the signature are bigger and more visible than the message, which result in a cluttered screen. The eye is caught by the pictures, it becomes difficult to follow the thread. This is not the case with avatars because they're placed at left, apart from the text. That's why I don't use pictures in my sigs. I'm even thinking of removing my current one because it's useless clutter.

Looking at the above thread, compare the simplest post (Tommy Boy's "fine for me") to the most cluttered (Yadad's "just so happens"). It's much more difficult to find the contents in Yadad's one.

That's just my 3.5 cents.

by **Buliwyf** » Sat Oct 18, 2003 1:31 am

Originally posted by Chacal
That's just my 3.5 cents.

is that in canadian change?

by **Chacal** » Sat Oct 18, 2003 2:58 am

by **Cpl. Bingham** » Sat Oct 18, 2003 4:09 pm

Sigs are fine with me, no matter how big. Maybe it's just me, but I can pick out the message and follow it just fine, even with a large distracting sig. I guess I'm just better than some people.

by **Chacal** » Sat Oct 18, 2003 4:46 pm

About the same time I wrote this, a friend sent me this picture. Now, you remember the time I wrote on the chat line "now licking snipers, starting from bottom"? I think this picture would make the ideal signature for me...

by **AnimalCracka** » Sat Oct 18, 2003 5:52 pm

Thats hillarious Chacal. That fits you perfect. :lol:

signatures

signatures

Who is online