3dmark scores

by **Weasel Meat** » Wed Jan 21, 2004 12:30 am

Originally posted by TChicken

Weasel Meat... a cpu score of 92 sounds suspicious.

I dont understand it either. and I never have any performance problems.

see why I dont like this benchmark.

here is another test.

xp2800+
ti4200
1gb ram
fortissimo iii sound card

by **Bullhead** » Wed Jan 21, 2004 8:11 am

Weasel, what mobo you running? maybe 3dmark03 has some issue with that chipset? or with the chipset drivers? I mean, you've got a 2800+, I've got a 3000+......and I score almost 500points higher on cpu?!! what's Sandra score your proc at?

Edit: just ran both myself, to give you some comparison numbers...

Arth. = 7976/3303
Muliti. = 19240/19359

by **MMmmGood** » Wed Jan 21, 2004 9:51 am

Originally posted by hightimber
Can anyone beat this? It's pretty lean and one of them is Task Manager which I had to open to show what was running.

I have 14 running including taskman

by **hightimber** » Wed Jan 21, 2004 10:10 am

Originally posted by MMmmGood
I have 14 running including taskman

Doh!

What am I running that you're not? I think I need that NMS service for my LAN but I suspect you'd know more than I on this topic.

by **Bagginses** » Wed Jan 21, 2004 10:44 am

Ok, I stated in a separate thread that I my video card was being under-used and so I realized I had the AGP setting set too low and I changed that and my Battlefield experience has been substantially improved. However, 3dmark score after I changed the AGP speed has been lower than it was before. About a 100 points lower. Can anyone explain that?

-Bagginses

by **Bullhead** » Wed Jan 21, 2004 12:01 pm

3dmark is retarded?

What AGP setting did you change? (I can't remember the thread....feeling to lazy to find it

)

by **Weasel Meat** » Wed Jan 21, 2004 10:01 pm

Originally posted by Bullhead
Weasel, what mobo you running? maybe 3dmark03 has some issue with that chipset? or with the chipset drivers? I mean, you've got a 2800+, I've got a 3000+......and I score almost 500points higher on cpu?!! what's Sandra score your proc at?

Edit: just ran both myself, to give you some comparison numbers...

Arth. = 7976/3303
Muliti. = 19240/19359

mobo= Gigabyte GA-7N400 Pro2
chipset= nForce2 Ultra400 chipset
drivers= nforce 3.13 whql

Sandra results

Arth= 8047/3318
multi = 19317/19723

by **shockwave203** » Tue Mar 30, 2004 9:02 pm

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=2304589

exactly 6300 3dmarks

damn bullhead you beating me by 49 points

by **Bullhead** » Wed Mar 31, 2004 12:09 am

Originally posted by shockwave203
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=2304589

exactly 6300 3dmarks

damn bullhead you beating me by 49 points

You still running stock speeds?

Also, I don't remember what Cat's that was...I'll re-run tomorrow and see if the numbers change any....

by **shockwave203** » Wed Mar 31, 2004 12:14 am

nah, I'm running it at 432/363

I can't believe how far the 2.4 is overclocking though-it's over 800mhz and is stable. gotta love the C-steppers

by **Bullhead** » Wed Mar 31, 2004 12:23 am

Yeah, I wish I could scrape together some cash, the mobile Bartons are overclocking fiends, hitting 2700MHz regularly. That coupled with this wicked memory I have, and I could fly (I'm memtest86 stable up to 230MHz 11-3-2-2.0, and might be able to get more with relaxed timings. Just can't get this damn 3000 to be stable at that speed without excessive voltage.).

Ps, the 1U cooler mod is a piece of cake to do. Looks nice, too

by **shockwave203** » Wed Mar 31, 2004 12:34 am

did you install the cooler? 1U cooler mod...never heard of that before

by **Fat Bastard** » Wed Mar 31, 2004 12:49 am

5113 ALL STOCK

by **shockwave203** » Wed Mar 31, 2004 12:59 am

Originally posted by Fat Bastard
5113 ALL STOCK

OVERCLOCK THAT THING!!!!:ar15:

by **Fat Bastard** » Wed Mar 31, 2004 2:35 am

I got to move some cards around so i get better airflow through. Things are kind of tight in there now.

Any suggestions on what I should oc the vid card or the processor?

3dmark scores

Who is online